Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the methods under consideration on the basis of absolute errors and CPU time for the stiff Problem 3 with different number of steps (n)

From: A new continuous hybrid block method with one optimal intrastep point through interpolation and collocation

n

Method

ME_u

ME_v

LE_u

LE_v

CPU time

216

\(\mathrm{POBM} _{5}\)

5.919e–07

5.919e–07

1.852e–17

1.949e–19

1.322e+00

\(\mathrm{RPOBM} _{5}\)

5.919e–07

5.919e–07

1.852e–17

1.949e–19

1.057e+00

\(\mathrm{BHSM} _{5}\)

1.917e–05

1.917e–05

6.320e–16

6.653e–18

7.299e–01

\(\mathrm{Sahi} _{6}\)

3.468e–05

3.468e–05

4.494e–14

4.730e–16

2.074e+00

Radau I5

3.468e–05

3.468e–05

1.185e–15

1.247e–17

1.270e+00

1296

\(\mathrm{POBM} _{5}\)

1.232e–11

1.232e–11

3.969e–22

4.177e–24

7.689e+00

\(\mathrm{RPOBM} _{5}\)

1.232e–11

1.232e–11

3.969e–22

4.177e–24

6.723e+00

\(\mathrm{BHSM} _{5}\)

4.197e–10

4.197e–10

1.300e–20

1.426e–22

2.474e+00

\(\mathrm{Sahi} _{6}\)

3.821e–09

3.821e–09

5.763e–18

6.067e–20

7.311e+00

Radau I5

1.362e–09

1.362e–09

2.540e–20

2.674e–22

4.044e+00

7776

\(\mathrm{POBM} _{5}\)

2.639e–16

2.639e–16

8.506e–27

8.954e–29

4.876e+01

\(\mathrm{RPOBM} _{5}\)

2.639e–16

2.639e–16

8.506e–27

8.954e–29

3.723e+01

\(\mathrm{BHSM} _{5}\)

9.010e–15

9.010e–15

2.903e–25

3.056e–27

1.450e+01

\(\mathrm{Sahi} _{6}\)

4.809e–13

4.809e–13

7.409e–22

7.798e–24

4.061e+01

Radau I5

3.811e–14

3.811e–14

5.444e–25

5.730e–27

2.482e+01