 Research Article
 Open access
 Published:
Global Attractivity Results for MixedMonotone Mappings in Partially Ordered Complete Metric Spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2009, Article number: 762478 (2009)
Abstract
We prove fixed point theorems for mixedmonotone mappings in partially ordered complete metric spaces which satisfy a weaker contraction condition than the classical Banach contraction condition for all points that are related by given ordering. We also give a global attractivity result for all solutions of the difference equation , where satisfies mixedmonotone conditions with respect to the given ordering.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
The following results were obtained first in [1] and were extended to the case of higherorder difference equations and systems in [2–6]. For the sake of completeness and the readers convenience, we are including short proofs.
Theorem 1.1.
Let be a compact interval of real numbers, and assume that
is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:

(a)
is nondecreasing in for each , and is nonincreasing in for each ;

(b)
If is a solution of the system
(1.2)
then .
Then
has a unique equilibrium and every solution of (1.3) converges to .
Proof.
Set
and for set
Now observe that for each ,
Set
Then
and by the continuity of ,
Therefore in view of (b),
from which the result follows.
Theorem 1.2.
Let be an interval of real numbers and assume that
is a continuous function satisfying the following properties:
(a) is nonincreasing in for each , and is nondecreasing in for each ;
(b)the difference equation (1.3) has no solutions of minimal period two in . Then (1.3) has a unique equilibrium and every solution of (1.3) converges to .
Proof.
Set
and for set
Now observe that for each ,
Set
Then clearly (1.8) holds and by the continuity of ,
In view of (b),
from which the result follows.
These results have been very useful in proving attractivity results for equilibrium or periodic solutions of (1.3) as well as for higherorder difference equations and systems of difference equations; see [2, 7–12]. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 have attracted considerable attention of the leading specialists in difference equations and discrete dynamical systems and have been generalized and extended to the case of maps in , see [3], and maps in Banach space with the cone see [4–6]. In this paper, we will extend Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 to the case of monotone mappings in partially ordered complete metric spaces.
On the other hand, there has been recent interest in establishing fixed point theorems in partially ordered complete metric spaces with a contractivity condition which holds for all points that are related by partial ordering; see [13–20]. These fixed point results have been applied mainly to the existence of solutions of boundary value problems for differential equations and one of them, namely [20], has been applied to the problem of solving matrix equations. See also [21], where the application to the boundary value problems for integrodifferential equations is given and [22] for application to some classes of nonexpansive mappings and [23] for the application of the LeraySchauder theory to the problems of an impulsive boundary value problem under the condition of nonwellordered upper and lower solutions. None of these results is global result, but they are rather existence results. In this paper, we combine the existence results with the results of the type of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 to obtain global attractivity results.
2. Main Results: Mixed Monotone Case I
Let be a partially ordered set and let be a metric on such that is a complete metric space. Consider We will use the following partial ordering.
For , we have
This partial ordering is well known as "southeast ordering" in competitive systems in the plane; see [5, 6, 12, 24, 25].
Let be a metric on defined as follows:
Clearly
We prove the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1.
Let be a map such that is nonincreasing in for all and nondecreasing in for all Suppose that the following conditions hold.
(i)There exists with

(ii)
There exists such that the following condition holds:
(2.5)

(iii)
If is a nondecreasing convergent sequence such that , then , for all and if is a nonincreasing convergent sequence such that , then , for all ; if for every , then
Then we have the following.

(a)
For every initial point such that condition (2.5) holds, , where satisfy
(2.6)
If in condition (2.5), then If in addition , then converge to the equilibrium of the equation

(b)
In particular, every solution of
(2.8)
such that converges to the equilibrium of (2.8).

(c)
The following estimates hold:
(2.9)
Proof.
Let and Since and for we have
Now, we have
For we let
By using the monotonicity of , we obtain
that is
We claim that for all the following inequalities hold:
Indeed, for using ,??, and (2.3), we obtain
Assume that (2.16) holds. Using the inequalities
and the contraction condition (2.4), we have
Similarly,
This implies that and are Cauchy sequences in
Indeed,
Since we have
Using (2.23), we conclude that is a Cauchy sequence. Similarly, we conclude that is a Cauchy sequence. Since is a complete metric space, then there exist such that
Using the continuity of which follows from contraction condition (2.4), the equations
imply (2.6).
Assume that Then, in view of the monotonicity of
By using induction, we can show that for all Assume that Then, in view of the monotonicity of , we have
Continuing in a similar way we can prove that for all By using condition (iii) we conclude that whenever exists we must have
which in the case when implies
By letting in (2.23), we obtain the estimate (2.9).
Remark 2.2.
Property (iii) is usually called closedness of the partial ordering, see [6], and is an important ingredient of the definition of an ordered space; see [17, 19].
Theorem 2.3.
Assume that along with conditions (i) and (ii) of Theorem 2.1, the following condition is satisfied:

(iv)
every pair of elements has either a lower or an upper bound.
Then, the fixed point is unique and
Proof.
First, we prove that the fixed point is unique. Condition (iv) is equivalent to the following. For every there exists that is comparable to See [16].
Let and be two fixed points of the map .
We consider two cases.
Case 1.
If is comparable to then for all is comparable to We have to prove that
Indeed, using (2.2), we obtain
We estimate , and
First, by using contraction condition (2.4), we have
Now, by using (2.31) and (2.30), we have
which implies that
Case 2.
If is not comparable to then there exists an upper bound or a lower bound of and Then, is comparable to and
Therefore, we have
Now, we obtain
We now estimate the righthand side of (2.35).
First, by using
we have
Similarly,
So,
Using induction, we obtain
Using (2.40), relation (2.35) becomes
So,
Finally, we prove that We will consider two cases.
Case A.
If is comparable to then is comparable to Now, we obtain
since this implies
Case B.
If is not comparable to then there exists an upper bound or alower bound of and , that is, there exists such that Then by using monotonicity character of we have
Now,
that is
Furthermore,
that is
Similarly,
that is
and
By using induction, we have
Since is a fixed point, we obtain
Using the contractivity condition (2.4) on we have
Now, we estimate the terms on the righthand side
Now, we have
Continuing this process, we obtain
Using the contractivity of we have
That is
So,
3. Main Results: Mixed Monotone Case II
Let be a partially ordered set and let be a metric on such that is a complete metric space. Consider We will use the following partial order.
For , we have
Let be a metric on defined as follows:
The following two theorems have similar proofs to the proofs of Theorems 2.1 and 2.3, respectively, and so their proofs will be skipped. Significant parts of these results have been included in [14] and applied successfully to some boundary value problems in ordinary differential equations.
Theorem 3.1.
Let be a map such that is nondecreasing in for all and nonincreasing in for all Suppose that the following conditions hold.

(i)
There exists with
(3.3)

(ii)
There exists such that the following condition holds:
(3.4)

(iii)
If is a nondecreasing convergent sequence such that , then , for all and if is a nonincreasing convergent sequence such that , then , for all ; if for every , then
Then we have the following.

(a)
For every initial point such that the condition (3.2) holds, , where satisfy
(3.5)
If in condition (3.4), then If in addition , then converge to the equilibrium of the equation

(b)
In particular, every solution of
(3.7)
such that converges to the equilibrium of (3.7).

(c)
The following estimates hold:
(3.8)
Theorem 3.2.
Assume that along with conditions (i) and (ii) of Theorem 3.1, the following condition is satisfied:

(iv)
every pair of elements has either a lower or an upper bound.
Then, the fixed point is unique and
Remark 3.3.
Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 generalize and extend the results in [14]. The new feature of our results is global attractivity part that extends Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. Most of presented ideas were presented for the first time in [14].
References
Kulenović MRS, Ladas G, Sizer WS: On the recursive sequence . Mathematical Sciences Research HotLine 1998,2(5):1–16.
Kulenović MRS, Ladas G: Dynamics of Second Order Rational Difference Equations: With Open Problems and Conjecture. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 2002:xii+218.
Kulenović MRS, Merino O: A global attractivity result for maps with invariant boxes. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series B 2006,6(1):97–110.
Nussbaum RD: Global stability, two conjectures and Maple. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2007,66(5):1064–1090. 10.1016/j.na.2006.01.005
Smith HL: The discrete dynamics of monotonically decomposable maps. Journal of Mathematical Biology 2006,53(4):747–758. 10.1007/s0028500600043
Smith HL: Global stability for mixed monotone systems. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2008,14(10–11):1159–1164. 10.1080/10236190802332126
Camouzis E, Ladas G: Dynamics of ThirdOrder Rational Difference Equations with Open Problems and Conjectures, Advances in Discrete Mathematics and Applications. Volume 5. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 2008:xxii+554.
Gibbons CH, Kulenović MRS, Ladas G: On the recursive sequence . Mathematical Sciences Research HotLine 2000,4(2):1–11.
Gibbons CH, Kulenović MRS, Ladas G, Voulov HD: On the trichotomy character of . Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2002,8(1):75–92. 10.1080/10236190211940
Grove EA, Ladas G: Periodicities in Nonlinear Difference Equations, Advances in Discrete Mathematics and Applications. Volume 4. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 2005:xiv+379.
Kulenović MRS, Merino O: Discrete Dynamical Systems and Difference Equations with Mathematica. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 2002:xvi+344.
Kulenović MRS, Nurkanovic M: Asymptotic behavior of a system of linear fractional difference equations. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2005,2005(2):127–143. 10.1155/JIA.2005.127
Agarwal RP, ElGebeily MA, O'Regan D: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Applicable Analysis 2008,87(1):109–116. 10.1080/00036810701556151
Gnana Bhaskar T, Lakshmikantham V: Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2006,65(7):1379–1393. 10.1016/j.na.2005.10.017
Nieto JJ, RodríguezLópez R: Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Acta Mathematica Sinica 2007,23(12):2205–2212. 10.1007/s1011400507690
Nieto JJ, RodríguezLópez R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005,22(3):223–239. 10.1007/s1108300590185
Nieto JJ, Pouso RL, RodríguezLópez R: Fixed point theorems in ordered abstract spaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2007,135(8):2505–2517. 10.1090/S0002993907087291
O'Regan D, Petruşel A: Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions in ordered metric spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,341(2):1241–1252. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.11.026
Petruşel A, Rus IA: Fixed point theorems in ordered spaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2006,134(2):411–418.
Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2004,132(5):1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002993903072204
Ahmad B, Nieto JJ: The monotone iterative technique for threepoint secondorder integrodifferential boundary value problems with Laplacian. Boundary Value Problems 2007, 2007:9.
Su Y, Wang D, Shang M: Strong convergence of monotone hybrid algorithm for hemirelatively nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2008, 2008:8.
Xian X, O'Regan D, Agarwal RP: Multiplicity results via topological degree for impulsive boundary value problems under nonwellordered upper and lower solution conditions. Boundary Value Problems 2008, 2008:21.
Kulenović MRS, Merino O: Competitiveexclusion versus competitivecoexistence for systems in the plane. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems. Series B 2006,6(5):1141–1156.
Smith HL: Planar competitive and cooperative difference equations. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 1998,3(5–6):335–357. 10.1080/10236199708808108
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out few fine details that improved the presented results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgić, D., Kalabušić, S. & Kulenović, M.R.S. Global Attractivity Results for MixedMonotone Mappings in Partially Ordered Complete Metric Spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2009, 762478 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/762478
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/762478