- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
Weak and Strong Convergence of an Implicit Iteration Process for an Asymptotically Quasi-
-Nonexpansive Mapping in Banach Space
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2010, Article number: 719631 (2009)
Abstract
We prove the weak and strong convergence of the implicit iterative process to a common fixed point of an asymptotically quasi--nonexpansive mapping
and an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping
, defined on a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach space.
1. Introduction
Let be a nonempty subset of a real normed linear space
and let
be a mapping. Denote by
the set of fixed points of
, that is,
. Throughout this paper, we always assume that
. Now let us recall some known definitions.
Definition 1.1.
A mapping is said to be
(i)nonexpansive, if for all
;
(ii)asymptotically nonexpansive, if there exists a sequence with
such that
for all
and
;
(iii)quasi-nonexpansive, if for all
;
(iv)asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive, if there exists a sequence with
such that
for all
and
.
Note that from the above definitions, it follows that a nonexpansive mapping must be asymptotically nonexpansive, and an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping must be asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive, but the converse does not hold (see [1]).
If is a closed nonempty subset of a Banach space and
is nonexpansive, then it is known that
may not have a fixed point (unlike the case if
is a strict contraction), and even when it has, the sequence
defined by
(the so-called Picard sequence) may fail to converge to such a fixed point.
In [2, 3] Browder studied the iterative construction for fixed points of nonexpansive mappings on closed and convex subsets of a Hilbert space. Note that for the past 30 years or so, the studies of the iterative processes for the approximation of fixed points of nonexpansive mappings and fixed points of some of their generalizations have been flourishing areas of research for many mathematicians (see for more details [1, 4]).
In [5] Diaz and Metcalf studied quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Ghosh and Debnath [6] established a necessary and sufficient condition for convergence of the Ishikawa iterates of a quasi-nonexpansive mapping on a closed convex subset of a Banach space. The iterative approximation problems for nonexpansive mapping, asymptotically nonexpansive mapping and asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping were studied extensively by Goebel and Kirk [7], Liu [8], Wittmann [9], Reich [10], Gornicki [11], Schu [12] Shioji and Takahashi [13], and Tan and Xu [14] in the settings of Hilbert spaces and uniformly convex Banach spaces.
There are many methods for approximating fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping. Xu and Ori [15] introduced implicit iteration process to approximate a common fixed point of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings in a Hilbert space. Recently, Sun [16] has extended an implicit iteration process for a finite family of nonexpansive mappings, due to Xu and Ori, to the case of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in a setting of Banach spaces. In [17] it has been studied the weak and strong convergence of implicit iteration process with errors to a common fixed point for a finite family of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces, which extends and improves the mentioned papers (see also [18, 19] for applications and other methods of implicit iteration processes).
There are many concepts which generalize a notion of nonexpansive mapping. One of such concepts is -nonexpansivity of a mapping
([20]). Let us recall some notions.
Definition 1.2.
Let ,
be two mappings of a nonempty subset
of a real normed linear space
. Then
is said to be
(i)- nonexpansive, if
for all
;
(ii)asymptotically - nonexpansive, if there exists a sequence
with
such that
for all
and
;
(iii)asymptotically quasi - nonexpansive mapping, if there exists a sequence
with
such that
for all
and
Remark 1.3.
If then an asymptotically
-nonexpansive mapping is asymptotically quasi-
-nonexpansive. But, there exists a nonlinear continuous asymptotically quasi
-nonexpansive mappings which is asymptotically
-nonexpansive.
In [21] a weakly convergence theorem for -asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping defined in Hilbert space was proved. In [22] strong convergence of Mann iterations of
-nonexpansive mapping has been proved. Best approximation properties of
-nonexpansive mappings were investigated in [20]. In [23] the weak convergence of three-step Noor iterative scheme for an
-nonexpansive mapping in a Banach space has been established. Recently, in [24] the weak and strong convergence of implicit iteration process to a common fixed point of a finite family of
-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings were studied. Assume that the family consists of one
-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping
. Now let us consider an iteration method used in [24], for
, which is defined by
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ1_HTML.gif)
where and
are two sequences in
. From this formula one can easily see that the employed method, indeed, is not implicit iterative processes. The used process is some kind of modified Ishikawa iteration.
Therefore, in this paper we will extend of the implicit iterative process, defined in [16], to -asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping defined on a uniformly convex Banach space. Namely, let
be a nonempty convex subset of a real Banach space
and
be an asymptotically quasi
-nonexpansive mapping, and let
be an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping. Then for given two sequences
and
in
we will consider the following iteration scheme:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ2_HTML.gif)
In this paper we will prove the weak and strong convergences of the implicit iterative process (1.2) to a common fixed point of and
. All results presented here generalize and extend the corresponding main results of [15–17] in a case of one mapping.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, we always assume that is a real Banach space. We denote by
and
the set of fixed points and the domain of a mapping
respectively. Recall that a Banach space
is said to satisfy Opial condition [25], if for each sequence
in
converging weakly to
implies that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ3_HTML.gif)
for all with
It is well known that (see [26]) inequality (2.1) is equivalent to
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ4_HTML.gif)
Definition 2.1.
Let be a closed subset of a real Banach space
and let
be a mapping.
(i)A mapping is said to be semiclosed (demiclosed) at zero, if for each bounded sequence
in
the conditions
converges weakly to
and
converges strongly to
imply
(ii)A mapping is said to be semicompact, if for any bounded sequence
in
such that
then there exists a subsequence
such that
strongly.
(iii) is called a uniformly
-Lipschitzian mapping, if there exists a constant
such that
for all
and
The following lemmas play an important role in proving our main results.
Lemma 2.2 (see [12]).
Let be a uniformly convex Banach space and let
be two constants with
Suppose that
is a sequence in
and
and
are two sequences in
such that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ5_HTML.gif)
holds some Then
Lemma 2.3 (see [14]).
Let and
be two sequences of nonnegative real numbers with
If one of the following conditions is satisfied:
(i)
(ii)
then the limit exists.
3. Main Results
In this section we will prove our main results. To formulate one, we need some auxiliary results.
Lemma 3.1.
Let be a real Banach space and let
be a nonempty closed convex subset of
Let
be an asymptotically quasi
-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
and
be an asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
such that
Suppose
and
and
are two sequences in
which satisfy the following conditions:
(i)
(ii)
If is the implicit iterative sequence defined by (1.2), then for each
the limit
exists.
Proof.
Since for any given
it follows from (1.2) that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ6_HTML.gif)
Again from (1.2) we derive that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ7_HTML.gif)
which means
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ8_HTML.gif)
Then from (3.3) one finds
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ9_HTML.gif)
and so
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ10_HTML.gif)
By condition (ii) we have and therefore
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ11_HTML.gif)
Hence from (3.5) we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ12_HTML.gif)
By putting the last inequality can be rewritten as follows:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ13_HTML.gif)
From condition (i) we find
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ14_HTML.gif)
Denoting in (3.8) one gets
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ15_HTML.gif)
and Lemma 2.3 implies the existence of the limit . This means the limit
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ16_HTML.gif)
exists, where is a constant. This completes the proof.
Now we prove the following result.
Theorem 3.2.
Let be a real Banach space and let
be a nonempty closed convex subset of
Let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-
-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
and let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
such that
Suppose
and
and
are two sequences in
which satisfy the following conditions:
(i)
(ii)
Then the implicitly iterative sequence defined by (1.2) converges strongly to a common fixed point in
if and only if
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ17_HTML.gif)
Proof.
The necessity of condition (3.12) is obvious. Let us proof the sufficiency part of theorem.
Since are uniformly
-Lipschitzian mappings, so
and
are continuous mappings. Therefore the sets
and
are closed. Hence
is a nonempty closed set.
For any given we have (see (3.8))
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ18_HTML.gif)
here as before with
Hence, one finds
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ19_HTML.gif)
From (3.14) due to Lemma 2.3 we obtain the existence of the limit . By condition (3.12), one gets
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ20_HTML.gif)
Let us prove that the sequence converges to a common fixed point of
and
In fact, due to
for all
and from (3.13), we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ21_HTML.gif)
Hence, for any positive integers from (3.16) with
we find
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ22_HTML.gif)
which means that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ23_HTML.gif)
for all , where
Since then for any given
there exists a positive integer number
such that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ24_HTML.gif)
Therefore there exists such that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ25_HTML.gif)
Consequently, for all from (3.18) we derive
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ26_HTML.gif)
which means that the strong convergence of the sequence is a common fixed point
of
and
This proves the required assertion.
We need one more auxiliary result.
Proposition 3.3.
Let be a real uniformly convex Banach space and let
be a nonempty closed convex subset of
Let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-
-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
and let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
such that
Suppose
and
and
are two sequences in
which satisfy the following conditions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Then the implicitly iterative sequence defined by (1.2) satisfies the following:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ27_HTML.gif)
Proof.
First, we will prove that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ28_HTML.gif)
According to Lemma 3.1 for any we have
. It follows from (1.2) that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ29_HTML.gif)
By means of asymptotically quasi--nonexpansivity of
and asymptotically quasi-nonexpansivity of
from (3.3) we get
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ30_HTML.gif)
Now using
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ31_HTML.gif)
with (3.25) and applying Lemma 2.2 to (3.24) one finds
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ32_HTML.gif)
Now from (1.2) and (3.27) we infer that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ33_HTML.gif)
On the other hand, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ34_HTML.gif)
which implies
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ35_HTML.gif)
The last inequality with (3.3) yields that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ36_HTML.gif)
Then (3.27) and (3.24) with the Squeeze theorem imply that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ37_HTML.gif)
Again from (1.2) we can see that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ38_HTML.gif)
From (3.11) one finds
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ39_HTML.gif)
Now applying Lemma 2.2 to (3.33) we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ40_HTML.gif)
Consider
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ41_HTML.gif)
Then from (3.27), (3.28), and (3.35) we get
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ42_HTML.gif)
Finally, from
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ43_HTML.gif)
with (3.28) and (3.37) we obtain
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ44_HTML.gif)
Analogously, one has
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ45_HTML.gif)
which with (3.28) and (3.35) implies
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ46_HTML.gif)
Now we are ready to formulate one of main results concerning weak convergence of the sequence .
Theorem 3.4.
Let be a real uniformly convex Banach space satisfying Opial condition and let
be a nonempty closed convex subset of
Let
be an identity mapping, let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-
-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
and,
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
such that
Suppose
and
and
are two sequences in
satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
If the mappings and
are semiclosed at zero, then the implicitly iterative sequence
defined by (1.2) converges weakly to a common fixed point of
and
Proof.
Let , then according to Lemma 3.1 the sequence
converges. This provides that
is a bounded sequence. Since
is uniformly convex, then every bounded subset of
is weakly compact. Since
is a bounded sequence in
then there exists a subsequence
such that
converges weakly to
Hence from (3.39) and (3.41) it follows that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ47_HTML.gif)
Since the mappings and
are semiclosed at zero, therefore, we find
and
which means
Finally, let us prove that converges weakly to
In fact, suppose the contrary, that is, there exists some subsequence
such that
converges weakly to
and
. Then by the same method as given above, we can also prove that
Taking and
and using the same argument given in the proof of (3.11), we can prove that the limits
and
exist, and we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ48_HTML.gif)
where are two nonnegative numbers. By virtue of the Opial condition of
, one finds
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ49_HTML.gif)
This is a contradiction. Hence This implies that
converges weakly to
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.4.
Now we formulate next result concerning strong convergence of the sequence .
Theorem 3.5.
Let be a real uniformly convex Banach space and let
be a nonempty closed convex subset of
Let
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-
-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
and
be a uniformly
-Lipschitzian asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
such that
Suppose
and
and
are two sequences in
satisfying the following conditions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
If at least one mapping of the mappings and
is semicompact, then the implicitly iterative sequence
defined by (1.2) converges strongly to a common fixed point of
and
Proof.
Without any loss of generality, we may assume that is semicompact. This with (3.39) means that there exists a subsequence
such that
strongly and
Since
are continuous, then from (3.39) and (3.41) we find
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ50_HTML.gif)
This shows that According to Lemma 3.1 the limit
exists. Then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2010%2F719631/MediaObjects/13663_2009_Article_1330_Equ51_HTML.gif)
which means that converges to
This completes the proof.
Note that all results presented here generalize and extend the corresponding main results of [15–17] in a case of one mapping.
References
Goebel K, Kirk WA: Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Volume 28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1990:viii+244.
Browder FE: Nonexpansive nonlinear operators in a Banach space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1965, 54: 1041–1044. 10.1073/pnas.54.4.1041
Browder FE: Convergence of approximants to fixed points of nonexpansive non-linear mappings in Banach spaces. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 1967, 24: 82–90.
Chidume Ch: Geometric Properties of Banach Spaces and Nonlinear Iterations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Volume 1965. Springer, London, UK; 2009:xviii+326.
Diaz JB, Metcalf FT: On the structure of the set of subsequential limit points of successive approximations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 1967, 73: 516–519. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11725-7
Ghosh MK, Debnath L: Convergence of Ishikawa iterates of quasi-nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1997,207(1):96–103. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5268
Goebel K, Kirk WA: A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1972, 35: 171–174. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0298500-3
Liu Q: Iterative sequences for asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2001,259(1):1–7. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.6980
Wittmann R: Approximation of fixed points of nonexpansive mappings. Archiv der Mathematik 1992,58(5):486–491. 10.1007/BF01190119
Reich S: Strong convergence theorems for resolvents of accretive operators in Banach spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1980,75(1):287–292. 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90323-6
Gornicki J: Weak convergence theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 1989,30(2):249–252.
Schu J: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1991,43(1):153–159. 10.1017/S0004972700028884
Shioji N, Takahashi W: Strong convergence theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive semigroups in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 1998,34(1):87–99. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00682-2
Tan K-K, Xu H-K: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iteration process. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1993,178(2):301–308. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1309
Xu H-K, Ori RG: An implicit iteration process for nonexpansive mappings. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 2001,22(5–6):767–773. 10.1081/NFA-100105317
Sun Z-H: Strong convergence of an implicit iteration process for a finite family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2003,286(1):351–358. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00537-7
Gu F, Lu J: A new composite implicit iterative process for a finite family of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2006, 2006:-11.
Li HY, Li HZ: Strong convergence of an iterative method for equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2009, 2009:-21.
Zhang F, Su Y: Strong convergence of modified implicit iteration processes for common fixed points of nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2007, 2007:-9.
Shahzad N: Generalized -nonexpansive maps and best approximations in Banach spaces. Demonstratio Mathematica 2004,37(3):597–600.
Temir S, Gul O: Convergence theorem for -asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping in Hilbert space. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,329(2):759–765. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.07.004
Rhodes BH, Temir S: Convergebce thorems for -nonexpansive mapping. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2006, 2006:-4.
Kumam P, Kumethong W, Jewwaiworn N: Weak convergence theorems of three-step Noor iterative scheme for -quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2008,2(57–60):2915–2920.
Temir S: On the convergence theorems of implicit iteration process for a finite family of -asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2009,225(2):398–405. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.07.049
Opial Z: Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximations for nonexpansive mappings. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 1967, 73: 591–597. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11761-0
Lami Dozo E: Multivalued nonexpansive mappings and Opial's condition. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1973, 38: 286–292.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the MOSTI Grant 01-01-08-SF0079.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Mukhamedov, F., Saburov, M. Weak and Strong Convergence of an Implicit Iteration Process for an Asymptotically Quasi--Nonexpansive Mapping in Banach Space.
Fixed Point Theory Appl 2010, 719631 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/719631
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/719631