- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Contractive-Like Mapping Principles in Ordered Metric Spaces and Application to Ordinary Differential Equations

*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*
**volume 2010**, Article number: 916064 (2010)

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a fixed point theorem for generalized contractions in partially ordered complete metric spaces. We also present an application to first-order ordinary differential equations.

## 1. Introduction

Existence of fixed point in partially ordered sets has been considered recently in [1–17]. Tarski's theorem is used in [9] to show the existence of solutions for fuzzy equations and in [11] to prove existence theorems for fuzzy differential equations. In [2, 6, 7, 10, 13] some applications to ordinary differential equations and to matrix equations are presented. In [3–5, 17] some fixed point theorems are proved for a mixed monotone mapping in a metric space endowed with partial order and the authors apply their results to problems of existence and uniqueness of solutions for some boundary value problems.

In the context of ordered metric spaces, the usual contraction is weakened but at the expense that the operator is monotone. The main tool in the proof of the results in this context combines the ideas in the contraction principle with those in the monotone iterative technique [18].

Let denote the class of the class of the functions which satisfies the condition

In [19] the following generalization of Banach's contraction principle appears.

Theorem 1.1.

Let be a complete metric space and let be a mapping satisfying

where . Then has a unique fixed point and converges to for each .

Recently, in [2] the authors prove a version of Theorem 1.1 in the context of ordered complete metric spaces. More precisely, they prove the following result.

Theorem 1.2.

Let be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric in such that is a complete metric space. Let be a nondecreasing mapping such that

where . Assume that either is continuous or satisfies the following condition:

Besides, suppose that for each there exists which is comparable to and . If there exists with , then has a unique fixed point.

The purpose of this paper is to generalize Theorem 1.2 with the help of the altering functions.

We recall the definition of such functions.

Definition 1.3.

An altering function is a function which satisfies the following.

(a) is continuous and nondecreasing.

(b) if and only if .

Altering functions have been used in metric fixed point theory in recent papers [20–22].

In [7] the authors use these functions and they prove some fixed point theorems in ordered metric spaces.

## 2. Fixed Point Theorems

Definition 2.1.

If is a partially ordered set and , we say that is monotone nondecreasing if for ,

This definition coincides with the notion of a nondecreasing function in the case and represents the usual total order in .

In the sequel, we prove the main result of the paper.

Theorem 2.2.

Let be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric in such that is a complete metric space. Let be a continuous and nondecreasing mapping such that

where is an altering function and .

If there exist with , then has a fixed point.

Proof.

If , then the proof is finished. Suppose that . Since and is a nondecreasing mapping, we obtain by induction that

Put . Taking into account that and since for each then, by (2.2), we get

Using the fact that is nondecreasing, we have

If there exists such that , then and is a fixed point and the proof is finished. In another case, suppose that for all . Then, taking into account (2.5), the sequence is decreasing and bounded below, so

Assume that .

Then, from (2.4), we have

Letting in the last inequality and by the fact that is an altering function, we get

and, consequently, Since this implies that = and this contradicts our assumption that Hence,

In what follows, we will show that is a Cauchy sequence.

Suppose that is not a Cauchy sequence. Then, there exists for which we can find subsequences and of with such that

Further, corresponding to , we can choose in such a way that it is the smallest integer with and satisfying (2.10), then

Using (2.10), (2.11), and the triangular inequality, we have

Letting and using (2.9), we get

Again, the triangular inequality gives us

Letting in the above two inequalities and using (2.9) and (2.13), we have

As and , by (2.2), we obtain

Taking into account (2.13) and (2.15) and the fact that is continuous and letting in (2.16), we get

As is an altering function, , the last inequality gives us

Since , this means that

This fact and (2.15) give us which is a contradiction.

This shows that is a Cauchy sequence.

Since is a complete metric space, there exists such that Moreover, the continuity of implies that

and this proves that is a fixed point.

In what follows, we prove that Theorem 2.2 is still valid for not necessarily continuous, assuming the following hypothesis in (which appears in [10, Theorem ]):

Theorem 2.3.

Let be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric in such that is a complete metric space. Assume that satisfies (2.21). Let be a nondecreasing mapping such that

where is an altering function and . If there exists with , then has a fixed point.

Proof.

Following the proof of Theorem 2.2, we only have to check that . As is a nondecreasing sequence in and then, by (2.21), we have for all , and, consequently,

Letting and using the continuity of , we have

or, equivalently,

As is an altering function, this gives us and, thus,

Now, we present an example where it can be appreciated that the hypotheses in Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 do not guarantee uniqueness of the fixed point. This example appears in [10].

Let and consider the usual order

is a partially ordered set whose different elements are not comparable. Besides, is a complete metric space considering as the Euclidean distance. The identity map is trivially continuous and nondecreasing and condition (2.2) of Theorem 2.2 is satisfied since elements in are only comparable to themselves. Moreover, and has two fixed points in .

In what follows, we give a sufficient condition for the uniqueness of the fixed point in Theorems 2.2 and 2.3. This condition appears in [16] and says that

In [10] it is proved that condition (2.27) is equivalent to

Theorem 2.4.

Adding condition (2.28) to the hypotheses of Theorem 2.2 (resp., Theorem 2.3), we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point of .

Proof.

Suppose that there exist which are fixed points of and . We distinguish two cases.

Case 1.

If and are comparable, then and are comparable for Using the contractive condition appearing in Theorem 2.2 (or Theorem 2.3) and the fact that , we get

which is a contradiction.

Case 2.

Using condition (2.28), there exists comparable to and . Monotonicity of implies that is comparable to and to , for Moreover, as , we get

Since is nondecreasing the above inequality gives us

Thus,

Assume that .

Taking into account that is an altering function and letting in (2.30), we obtain

and this implies that .

Since then we get

and, consequently, , which is a contradiction.

Hence, .

Analogously, it can be proved that

Finally, as

and taking limit, we obtain .

This finishes the proof.

Remark 2.5.

Under the assumptions of Theorem 2.4, it can be proved that for every , , where is the fixed point (i.e., the operator is Picard).

In fact, for and comparable to then using the same argument that is in Case 1 of Theorem 2.4 can prove that and, hence, .

If is not comparable to , we take that is comparable to and . Using a similar argument that is in Case 2 of Theorem 2.4, we obtain

Finally,

and taking limit as , we obtain or, equivalently, = .

Remark 2.6.

Notice that if is totally ordered, condition (2.28) is obviously satisfied.

Remark 2.7.

Considering the identity mapping in Theorem 2.4, we obtain Theorem 1.2, being the main result of [2].

## 3. Application to Ordinary Differential Equations

In this section we present an example where our results can be applied.

This example is inspired by [10].

We study the existence of solution for the following first-order periodic problem

where and is a continuous function.

Previously, we considered the space () of continuous functions defined on . Obviously, this space with the metric given by

is a complete metric space. can also be equipped with a partial order given by

Clearly, satisfies condition (2.28), since for the function .

Moreover, in [10] it is proved that with the above-mentioned metric satisfies condition (2.21).

Now, let denote the class of functions satisfying the following.

(i) is nondecreasing.

(ii), .

(iii),

where is the class of functions defined in Section 1.

Examples of such functions are , with , , and .

Recall now the following definition

Definition 3.1.

A lower solution for (3.1) is a function such that

Now, we present the following theorem about the existence of solution for problem (3.1) in presence of a lower solution.

Theorem 3.2.

Consider problem (3.1) with continuous and suppose that there exist with

such that for with

where . Then the existence of a lower solution for (3.1) provides the existence of a unique solution of (3.1).

Proof.

Problem (3.1) can be written as

This problem is equivalent to the integral equation

where is the Green function given by

Define by

Notice that if is a fixed point of , then is a solution of (3.1).

In the sequel, we check that hypotheses in Theorem 2.4 are satisfied.

The mapping is nondecreasing since, by hypothesis, for

and this implies, taking into account that for , that

Besides, for , we have

Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the last integral, we get

The first integral gives us

As is nondecreasing, the second integral in (3.14) can be estimated by

Taking into account (3.14), (3.15), and (3.16), from (3.13) we get

Since , the last inequality gives us

or, equivalently,

This implies that

Putting , which is an altering function, and because , we have

This proves that the operator satisfies condition (2.2) of Theorem 2.2.

Finally, letting be a lower solution for (3.1), we claim that

In fact,

Multiplying by ,

and this gives us

As , the last inequality implies that

and so

This and (3.24) give us

and, consequently,

Finally, Theorem 2.4 gives that has a unique fixed point.

Remark 3.3.

Notice that if , then . In fact, as , then is nondecreasing and, consequently, is also nondecreasing.

Moreover, as , then , and, thus, .

Finally, as , and as , then it is easily seen that .

Example 3.4.

Consider given by

It is easily seen that . Taking into account Remark 3.3, .

Now, we consider problem (3.1) with continuous and suppose that there exist with

such that for with

where is the function above mentioned.

This example can be treated by our Theorem 3.2 but it cannot be covered by the results of [6] because is not increasing.

## References

Agarwal RP, El-Gebeily MA, O'Regan D:

**Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces.***Applicable Analysis*2008,**87**(1):109–116. 10.1080/00036810701556151Amini-Harandi A, Emami H:

**A fixed point theorem for contraction type maps in partially ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(5):2238–2242. 10.1016/j.na.2009.10.023Burgić D, Kalabušić S, Kulenović MRS:

**Global attractivity results for mixed-monotone mappings in partially ordered complete metric spaces.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2009,**2009:**-17.Ćirić L, Cakić N, Rajović M, Ume JS:

**Monotone generalized nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2008,**2008:**-11.Gnana Bhaskar T, Lakshmikantham V:

**Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2006,**65**(7):1379–1393. 10.1016/j.na.2005.10.017Harjani J, Sadarangani K:

**Fixed point theorems for weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered sets.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(7–8):3403–3410. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.240Harjani J, Sadarangani K:

**Fixed point theorems for weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered sets.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(7–8):3403–3410. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.240Lakshmikantham V, Ćirić L:

**Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**70**(12):4341–4349. 10.1016/j.na.2008.09.020Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R:

**Existence of extremal solutions for quadratic fuzzy equations.***Fixed Point Theory and Applications*2005,**2005**(3):321–342. 10.1155/FPTA.2005.321Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R:

**Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations.***Order*2005,**22**(3):223–239. 10.1007/s11083-005-9018-5Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R:

**Applications of contractive-like mapping principles to fuzzy equations.***Revista Matemática Complutense*2006,**19**(2):361–383.Nieto JJ, Pouso RL, Rodríguez-López R:

**Fixed point theorems in ordered abstract spaces.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*2007,**135**(8):2505–2517. 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08729-1Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R:

**Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations.***Acta Mathematica Sinica*2007,**23**(12):2205–2212. 10.1007/s10114-005-0769-0O'Regan D, Petruşel A:

**Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions in ordered metric spaces.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**341**(2):1241–1252. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.11.026Petruşel A, Rus IA:

**Fixed point theorems in ordered****-spaces.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*2006,**134**(2):411–418.Ran ACM, Reurings MCB:

**A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*2004,**132**(5):1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07220-4Wu Y:

**New fixed point theorems and applications of mixed monotone operator.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**341**(2):883–893. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.10.063Cabada A, Nieto JJ:

**Fixed points and approximate solutions for nonlinear operator equations.***Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics*2000,**113**(1–2):17–25. 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00240-XGeraghty MA:

**On contractive mappings.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1973,**40:**604–608. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0334176-5Babu GVR, Lalitha B, Sandhya ML:

**Common fixed point theorems involving two generalized altering distance functions in four variables.***Proceedings of the Jangjeon Mathematical Society*2007,**10**(1):83–93.Naidu SVR:

**Some fixed point theorems in metric spaces by altering distances.***Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal*2003,**53**(1):205–212. 10.1023/A:1022991929004Sastry KPR, Babu GVR:

**Some fixed point theorems by altering distances between the points.***Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics*1999,**30**(6):641–647.

## Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by "Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia", Project MTM 2007/65706. This work is dedicated to Professor W. Takahashi on the occasion of his retirement.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access**
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Caballero, J., Harjani, J. & Sadarangani, K. Contractive-Like Mapping Principles in Ordered Metric Spaces and Application to Ordinary Differential Equations.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl* **2010**, 916064 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/916064

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/916064