 Research Article
 Open access
 Published:
A Method for a Solution of Equilibrium Problem and Fixed Point Problem of a Nonexpansive Semigroup in Hilbert's Spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volumeÂ 2011, ArticleÂ number:Â 208434 (2011)
Abstract
We introduce a viscosity approximation method for finding a common element of the set of solutions for an equilibrium problem involving a bifunction defined on a closed, convex subset and the set of fixed points for a nonexpansive semigroup on another one in Hilbert's spaces.
1. Introduction
Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Denote the metric projection from onto by . Let be a nonexpansive mapping on , that is, and , for all . We use to denote the set of fixed points of , that is, .
Let be a nonexpansive semigroup on a closed convex subset , that is,
(1)for each , is a nonexpansive mapping on ,
(2) for all ,
(3) for all ,
(4)for each , the mapping from into is continuous.
Denote by . We know [1, 2] that is a closed, convex subset in and if is bounded.
The equilibrium problem is for a bifunction defined on to find such that
Assume that the bifunction satisfies the following set of standard properties:
(A1), for all ,
(A2) for all ,
(A3)for every , is weakly lower semicontinuous and convex,
(A4), for all .
Denote the set of solutions of (1.1) by . We also know [3] that is a closed convex subset in .
The problem studied in this paper is formulated as follows. Let and be closed convex subsets in . Let be a bifunction satisfying conditions (A1)â€“(A4) with replaced by and let be a nonexpansive semigroup on . Find an element
where and denote the set of solutions of an equilibrium problem involving by a bifunction on and the fixed point set of a nonexpansive semigroup on a closed convex subset , respectively.
In the case that , , , and , a nonexpansive mapping on , for all , (1.2) is the fixed point problem of a nonexpansive mapping. In 2000, Moudafi [4] proved the following strong convergence theorem.
Theorem 1.1.
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subset of a Hilbert space and let be a nonexpansive mapping on such that . Let be a contraction on and let be a sequence generated by: and
where satisfies
Then, converges strongly to , where .
Such a method for approximation of fixed points is called the viscosity approximation method. It has been developed by Chen and Song [5] to find , the set of fixed points for a semigroup on . They proposed the following algorithm: and
where , is a contraction, and are sequences of positive real numbers satisfying the conditions: , , and as .
Recently, Yao and Noor [6] proposed a new viscosity approximation method
where , , and are in , , for finding , when satisfies the uniformly asymptotically regularity condition
uniformly in , and is any bounded subset of . Further, Plubtieng and Pupaeng in [7] studied the following algorithm:
where and are in satisfying the following conditions: , , , and is a positive divergent real sequence.
There were some methods proposed to solve equilibrium problem (1.1); see for instance [8â€“12]. In particular, Combettes and Histoaga [3] proposed several methods for solving the equilibrium problem.
In 2007, S. Takahashi and W. Takahashi [13] combinated the Moudafi's method with the Combettes and Histoaga's result in [3] to find an element . They proved the following strong convergence theorem.
Theorem 1.2.
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subset of a Hilbert space , let be a nonexpansive mapping on and let be a bifunction from to satisfying (A1)â€“(A4) such that . Let be a contraction on and let and be sequences generated by: and
where and satisfy
Then, and converge strongly to , where .
Very recently, Ceng and Wong in [14] combined algorithm (1.6) with the result in [3] to propose the following procudure:
for finding an element in the case that under the uniformly asymptotic regularity condition on the nonexpansive semigroup on .
In this paper, motivated by the above results, to solve (1.2), we introduce the following algorithm:
where is a contraction on , that is, and , for all , ,
for all , , , and be the sequences in (0,1), and , are the sequences in satisfy the following conditions:
(i),
(ii), ,
(iii),
(iv) with bounded ,
(v) and .
The strong convergence of (1.12)(1.13) and its corollaries are showed in the next section.
2. Main Results
We formulate the following facts needed in the proof of our results.
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a real Hilbert space . There holds the following identity:
Lemma 2.2 (see [15]).
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subset of a real Hilbert space . For any , there exists a unique such that , for all , and if and only if for all .
Lemma 2.3 (see [16]).
Let be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers satisfying the following condition:
where and are sequences of real numbers such that , , and . Then, .
Lemma 2.4 (see [9]).
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subset of and be a bifunction of into satisfying the conditions (A1)â€“(A4). Let and . Then, there exists such that
Lemma 2.5 (see [9]).
Assume that satisfies the conditions (A1)â€“(A4). For and , define a mapping as follows:
Then, the following statements hold:
(i) is singlevalued,
(ii) is firmly nonexpansive, that is, for any ,
(iii),
(iv) is closed and convex.
Lemma 2.6 (see [17]).
Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset in a real Hilbert space and let be a nonexpansive semigroup on . Then, for any ,
Lemma 2.7 (Demiclosedness Principle [18]).
If is a closed convex subset of , is a nonexpansive mapping on , is a sequence in such that and , then .
Lemma 2.8 (see [19]).
Let and be bounded sequences in a Banach space and be a sequence in with . Suppose for all and . Then, .
Now, we are in a position to prove the following result.
Theorem 2.9.
Let and be two nonempty, closed, convex subsets in a real Hilbert space . Let be a bifunction from to satisfying conditions (A1)â€“(A4) with replaced by , let be a nonexpansive semigroup on such that and let be a contraction of into itself. Then, and generated by (1.12)(1.13) converge strongly to , where .
Proof.
Let . Then, is a contraction of into itself. In fact, from for all and the nonexpansive property of for a closed convex subset in , it implies that
Hence, is a contraction of into itself. Since is complete, there exists a unique element such that . Such a is an element of , because .
By Lemma 2.4, and are well defined. For each , by putting and using (ii) and (iii) in Lemma 2.5, we have that
Put . Clearly, . Suppose that . Then, we have, from the nonexpansive property of , condition (i) and (2.8), that
So, for all and hence is bounded. Therefore, , , and are also bounded.
Next, we show that as . For this purpose, we define a sequence by
Then, we observe that
and, hence,
Now, we estimate the value by using and . We have from (2.4) that
Putting in (2.13) and in (2.14), adding the one to the other obtained result and using (A2), we obtain that
and, hence,
Without loss of generality, let us assume that there exists a real number such that for all . Then, we have
and, hence,
On the other hand,
So, we get from (2.10), (2.12), (2.18), (2.19), and the nonexpansive property of that
So,
and by Lemma 2.8, we have
Consequently, it follows from (2.10) and condition (iii) that
By (2.18), (2.23), and
we also obtain
We have, for every , from (iii) in Lemma 2.5, that
and, hence,
Therefore, from the convexity of and condition (i), we have
and, hence,
Without loss of generality, we assume that for all . Then, for sufficiently large ,
So, we have
Further, since , by condition (i), (2.19) and
we obtain that
Then, from (2.25), (2.33) and the conditions on and , it implies that
and so
Since
we obtain from (2.31) that
Next, we show that
We choose a subsequence of the sequence such that
As is bounded, there exists a subsequence of the sequence which converges weakly to . From (2.37), we also have that converges weakly to . Since and and , are two closed convex subsets in , we have that .
First, we prove that . From (2.4) it follows that
and, hence, by using condition (A2), we get
Therefore,
This together with condition (A3) and (2.31) imply that
So, for all . It means that .
Next we show that . Since , we have
and, hence, from (2.31) it follows that
Thus, (2.37) together with (2.45) imply
Therefore, also converges weakly to , as .
On the other hand, for each , we have that
Let . Since , we have from (2.33) that
So, is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset. It is easy to verify that is a nonexpansive semigroup on . By Lemma 2.6, we get
for every fixed , and hence, by (2.45)â€“(2.47), we obtain
for each . By Lemma 2.7, for all , because for any mapping . It means that . Therefore, . Since , we have from Lemma 2.2 that
So, (2.38) is proved. Further, since , by using Lemma 2.1, we have that
This with (2.8) implies that
where
Using Lemma 2.3, we get
From (2.33) it follows that as . This completes the proof.
Remarks 2.

(a)
Note that the following parameters , , , for any fixed number , and with for all satisfy all conditions in Theorem 2.9.

(b)
If for all and , then we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.10.
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subsets in a real Hilbert space . Let be a bifunction from to satisfying conditions (A1)â€“(A4), let be a nonexpansive mapping on such that and let be a contraction of into itself. Let and be sequences generated by and
where , , , and satisfy conditions (i)â€“(v). Then, and converge strongly to , where .
Proof.
From the proof of the theorem, in (2.12).

(c)
In the case that , a closed convex subset in , for all , we have the following result.
Corollary 2.11.
Let be a nonempty, closed, convex subsets in a real Hilbert space . Let be a nonexpansive semigroup on such that and let be a contraction of into itself. Let and be sequences generated by and
where is defined by (1.13) for all and , , , and satisfy conditions (i)â€“(v). Then, the sequences and converge strongly to , where .
Proof.
By Lemma 2.2, if and only if
Clearly, in addition, if is a contraction of into itself and , then we obtain the algoritm
where is defined by (1.13) and , , , and satisfy conditions (i)â€“(v). This algorithm is different from Yao and Noor's algorithm (1.6), in which for all . It likes completely the Plubtieng and Punpaeng's algorithm (1.8), but converges under a new condition on .
References
Browder FE: Fixedpoint theorems for noncompact mappings in Hilbert space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1965, 53: 1272â€“1276. 10.1073/pnas.53.6.1272
DeMarr R: Common fixed points for commuting contraction mappings. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1963, 13: 1139â€“1141.
Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA: Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis 2005,6(1):117â€“136.
Moudafi A: Viscosity approximation methods for fixedpoints problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2000,241(1):46â€“55. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6615
Chen R, Song Y: Convergence to common fixed point of nonexpansive semigroups. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2007,200(2):566â€“575. 10.1016/j.cam.2006.01.009
Yao Y, Noor MA: On viscosity iterative methods for variational inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,325(2):776â€“787. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.091
Plubtieng S, Punpaeng R: Fixedpoint solutions of variational inequalities for nonexpansive semigroups in Hilbert spaces. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2008,48(1â€“2):279â€“286. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.10.002
Antipin AS: Equilibrium programming: proximal methods. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 1997,37(11):1285â€“1296.
Blum E, Oettli W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. The Mathematics Student 1994,63(1â€“4):123â€“145.
Mastroeni G: Gap functions for equilibrium problems. Journal of Global Optimization 2003,27(4):411â€“426. 10.1023/A:1026050425030
Chadli O, Konnov IV, Yao JC: Descent methods for equilibrium problems in a Banach space. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2004,48(3â€“4):609â€“616. 10.1016/j.camwa.2003.05.011
Konnov IV, Pinyagina OV: Dgap functions and descent methods for a class of monotone equilibrium problems. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 2003, 13: 57â€“65.
Takahashi S, Takahashi W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,331(1):506â€“515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.036
Ceng LC, Wong NC: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of nonlinear semigroups. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 2009,13(5):1497â€“1513.
MartinezYanes C, Xu HK: Strong convergence of the CQ method for fixed point iteration processes. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2006,64(11):2400â€“2411. 10.1016/j.na.2005.08.018
Xu HK: An iterative approach to quadratic optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2003,116(3):659â€“678. 10.1023/A:1023073621589
Shimizu T, Takahashi W: Strong convergence to common fixed points of families of nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1997,211(1):71â€“83. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5398
Goebel K, Kirk WA: Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Volume 28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1990:viii+244.
Suzuki T: Strong convergence of Krasnoselskii and Mann's type sequences for oneparameter nonexpansive semigroups without Bochner integrals. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2005,305(1):227â€“239. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.017
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Vietnamese National Foundation of Science and Technology Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Buong, N., Duong, N. A Method for a Solution of Equilibrium Problem and Fixed Point Problem of a Nonexpansive Semigroup in Hilbert's Spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2011, 208434 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/208434
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/208434