- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Hybrid Algorithm for Finding Common Elements of the Set of Generalized Equilibrium Problems and the Set of Fixed Point Problems of Strictly Pseudocontractive Mapping

*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*
**volumeÂ 2011**, ArticleÂ number:Â 274820 (2011)

## Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to prove the strong convergence theorem for finding a common element of the set of fixed point problems of strictly pseudocontractive mapping in Hilbert spaces and two sets of generalized equilibrium problems by using the hybrid method.

## 1. Introduction

Let be a closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space , and let be a bifunction. Recall that the equilibrium problem for a bifunction is to find such that

The set of solutions of (1.1) is denoted by . Given a mapping , let for all . Then, if and only if for all ; that is, is a solution of the variational inequality. Let be a nonlinear mapping. The variational inequality problem is to find a such that

for all . The set of solutions of the variational inequality is denoted by . Now, we consider the following generalized equilibrium problem:

The set of is denoted by , that is,

In the case of , is denoted by . In the case of , is also denoted by . Numerous problems in physics, optimization, variational inequalities, minimax problems, the Nash equilibrium problem in noncooperative games, and economics are reduced to find a solution of (1.3); see, for instance, [1â€“3].

A mapping of into is called *inverse strongly monotone mapping*, see [4], if there exists a positive real number such that

for all . The following definition is well known.

Definition 1.1.

A mapping is said to be a -strict pseudocontraction if there exists such that

A mapping is called *nonexpansive* if

for all .

We know that -strict pseudocontraction includes a class of nonexpansive mappings. If , is said to be a pseudocontractive*mapping*. is *strong pseudocontraction* if there exists a positive constant such that is pseudocontraction. In a real Hilbert space , (1.6) is equivalent to

is pseudocontraction if and only if

Then, is strong pseudocontraction if there exists positive constant

The class of -strict pseudocontractions falls into the one between classes of nonexpansive mappings, and the pseudocontraction mappings, and the class of strong pseudocontraction mappings is independent of the class of -strict pseudocontraction.

We denote by the set of fixed points of . If is bounded, closed, and convex, and is a nonexpansive mapping of into itself, then is nonempty; for instance, see [5]. Browder and Petryshyn [6] show that if a -strict pseudocontraction has a fixed point in , then starting with an initial , the sequence generated by the recursive formula:

where is a constant such that , converges weakly to a fixed point of . Marino and Xu [7] have extended Browder and Petryshyns above-mentioned result by proving that the sequence generated by the following Manns algorithm [8]:

converges weakly to a fixed point of provided the control sequence satisfies the conditions that for all and . In 1974, S. Ishikawa proved the following strong convergence theorem of pseudocontractive mapping.

Theorem 1.2 (see [9]).

Let be a convex compact subset of a Hilbert space , and let be a Lipschitzian pseudocontractive mapping. For any , suppose that the sequence is defined by

where , are two real sequences in satisfying

(i),

(ii),

(iii).

Then converges strongly to a fixed point of .

In order to prove a strong convergence theorem of Mann algorithm (1.12) associated with strictly pseudocontractive mapping, in 2006, Marino and Xu [7] proved the following theorem for strict pseudocontractive mapping in Hilbert space by using method.

Theorem 1.3 (see [7]).

Let be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let be a -strict pseudocontraction for some , and assume that the fixed point set of is nonempty. Let be the sequence generated by the following algorithm:

Assume that the control sequence is chosen so that for all . Then converges strongly to . Very recently, in 2010, [10] established the hybrid algorithm for Lipschitz pseudocontractive mapping as follows:

Under suitable conditions of and , they proved that the sequence defined by (1.15) converges strongly to .

Many authors study the problem for finding a common element of the set of fixed point problem and the set of equilibrium problem in Hilbert spaces, for instance, [2, 3, 11â€“15]. The motivation of (1.14), (1.15), and the research in this direction, we prove the strong convergence theorem for finding solution of the set of fixed points of strictly pseudocontractive mapping and two sets of generalized equilibrium problems by using the hybrid method.

## 2. Preliminaries

In order to prove our main results, we need the following lemmas. Let be closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space , and let be the metric projection of onto ; that is, for , satisfies the property

The following characterizes the projection .

Lemma 2.1 (see [5]).

Given that and , then if and only if the following inequality holds:

The following lemma is well known.

Lemma 2.2.

Let be Hilbert space, and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be -strictly pseudocontractive, then the fixed point set of is closed and convex so that the projection is well defined.

Lemma 2.3 ((demiclosedness principle) (see [16]).

If is a -strict pseudocontraction on closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space , then is demiclosed at any point .

To solve the equilibrium problem for a bifunction , assume that satisfies the following conditions:

() for all ,

() is monotone, that is, ,

()for all ,

()for all is convex and lower semicontinuous.

The following lemma appears implicitly in [1].

Lemma 2.4 (see [1]).

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let be a bifunction of into satisfying . Let , and . Then, there exists such that

for all .

Lemma 2.5 (see [11]).

Assume that satisfies . For and , define a mapping as follows:

for all . Then, the following hold:

(1) is single-valued;

(2) is firmly nonexpansive, that is,

(3);

(4) is closed and convex.

Lemma 2.6 (see [17]).

Let be a closed convex subset of . Let be a sequence in and . Let ; if is such that and satisfy the condition

then , as .

Lemma 2.7 (see [7]).

For a real Hilbert space H, the following identities hold: if is a sequence in H weak convergence to , then

for all .

## 3. Main Result

Theorem 3.1.

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let and be bifunctions from into satisfying , respectively. Let be an *Î±*-inverse strongly monotone mapping, and let be a inverse strongly monotone mapping. Let be a strict pseudocontraction mapping with . Let be a sequence generated by and

where is sequence in , , and satisfy the following conditions:

(i),

(ii).

Then converges strongly to .

Proof.

First, we show that is nonexpansive. Let . Since is inverse strongly monotone mapping and , we have

Thus is nonexpansive, so are , , and . Since

then we have

By Lemma 2.5, we have . By the same argument as above, we conclude that .

Let . Then and . Hence

Again by Lemma 2.5, we have . By nonexpansiveness of and , we have

By (3.6), we have

Next, we show that is closed and convex for every . It is obvious that is closed. In fact, we know that, for ,

So, we have that for all and , it follows that

Then, we have that is convex. By Lemmas 2.5 and 2.2, we conclude that is closed and convex. This implies that is well defined. Next, we show that for every .

Taking , we have

It follows that . Then, we have , . Since , for every , we have

In particular, we have

By (3.11), we have that is bounded, so are . Since and , we have

It is implied that

Hence, we have that exists. Since

it is implied that

Since , we have

And by (3.16), we have

Since

by (3.16) and (3.18), we have

Next, we show that

Let , by (3.10) and (3.7), we have

Since , , we have

Since , , we have

Substituting (3.23) and (3.24) into (3.22),

It is implied that

By (3.20) and condition , we have

By using the same method as (3.27), we have

By Lemma 2.5 and firm nonexpansiveness of , we have

By (3.29), it is implied that

Again, by Lemma 2.5 and firm nonexpansiveness of , we have

By (3.31), it is implied that

Substituting (3.30) and (3.32) into (3.22), we have

which implies that

and by (3.27), (3.28), (3.20), and conditions , , we have

By using the same method as (3.35), we have

Since

from (3.35), (3.36), and condition , we have

By (3.20) and (3.38), we have

Since

from (3.39) and condition , we have

Let be the set of all weaks -limit of . We will show that . Since is bounded, then . Letting , there exists a subsequence of converging to . By (3.35), we have as . Since , for any , we have

From , we have

This implies that

Put for all and . Then, we have . So, from (3.44), we have

Since , we have . Further, from monotonicity of , we have . So, we have

From , , and (3.46), we also have

Thus

Letting , we have, for each ,

This implies that

From (3.36), we have . Since , for any , we have

By using the same method as (3.50), we have

Since and (3.38), we have . By Lemma 2.3, is demiclosed at zero, and by (3.41), we have

From (3.50), (3.52), and (3.53), we have . Hence . Therefore, by (3.12) and Lemma 2.6, we have that converges strongly to . The proof is completed.

## 4. Applications

By using our main result, we have the following results in Hilbert spaces.

Theorem 4.1.

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let and be bifunctions from into satisfying , respectively. Let be a -strict pseudocontraction mapping with . Let be a sequence generated by and

where is sequence in , , and satisfy the following conditions:

(i),

(ii).

Then converges strongly to .

Proof.

Putting in Theorem 3.1, we have the desired conclusions.

Theorem 4.2.

Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space . Let be bifunctions from into satisfying , respectively. Let be an *Î±*-inverse strongly monotone mapping, and let be a sequence generated by and

where is sequence in , , and , for all . Then converges strongly to .

Proof.

Putting , , and , for all , in Theorem 3.1, we have the desired conclusions.

## References

Blum E, Oettli W:

**From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems.***Mathematics Student*1994,**63**(1â€“4):123â€“145.Moudafi A, ThÃ©ra M:

**Proximal and dynamical approaches to equilibrium problems.**In*Ill-Posed Variational Problems and Regularization Techniques (Trier, 1998), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems*.*Volume 477*. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 1999:187â€“201.Takahashi S, Takahashi W:

**Strong convergence theorem for a generalized equilibrium problem and a nonexpansive mapping in a Hilbert space.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2008,**69**(3):1025â€“1033. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.042Iiduka H, Takahashi W:

**Weak convergence theorems by CesÃ¡ro means for nonexpansive mappings and inverse-strongly-monotone mappings.***Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis*2006,**7**(1):105â€“113.Takahashi W:

*Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications*. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan; 2000:iv+276.Browder FE, Petryshyn WV:

**Construction of fixed points of nonlinear mappings in Hilbert space.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1967,**20:**197â€“228. 10.1016/0022-247X(67)90085-6Marino G, Xu H-K:

**Weak and strong convergence theorems for strict pseudo-contractions in Hilbert spaces.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007,**329**(1):336â€“346. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.055Mann WR:

**Mean value methods in iteration.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1953,**4:**506â€“510. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1953-0054846-3Ishikawa S:

**Fixed points by a new iteration method.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1974,**44:**147â€“150. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0336469-5Tanga Y-C, Penga J-G, Liu L-W:

**Strong convergence theorem for pseudo-contractive mappings in Hilbert spaces.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2011,**74:**380â€“385. 10.1016/j.na.2010.08.048Combettes PL, Hirstoaga SA:

**Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces.***Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis*2005,**6**(1):117â€“136.Kangtunyakarn A, Suantai S:

**A new mapping for finding common solutions of equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of finite family of nonexpansive mappings.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(10):4448â€“4460. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.003Kangtunyakarn A, Suantai S:

**Hybrid iterative scheme for generalized equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of finite family of nonexpansive mappings.***Nonlinear Analysis. Hybrid Systems*2009,**3**(3):296â€“309. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.01.012Takahashi S, Takahashi W:

**Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007,**331**(1):506â€“515. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.036Colao V, Marino G, Xu H-K:

**An iterative method for finding common solutions of equilibrium and fixed point problems.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**344**(1):340â€“352. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.02.041Zhou H:

**Convergence theorems of fixed points for -strict pseudo-contractions in Hilbert spaces.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2008,**69**(2):456â€“462. 10.1016/j.na.2007.05.032Martinez-Yanes C, Xu H-K:

**Strong convergence of the CQ method for fixed point iteration processes.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2006,**64**(11):2400â€“2411. 10.1016/j.na.2005.08.018

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Kangtunyakarn, A. Hybrid Algorithm for Finding Common Elements of the Set of Generalized Equilibrium Problems and the Set of Fixed Point Problems of Strictly Pseudocontractive Mapping.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl* **2011**, 274820 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/274820

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/274820