- Research Article
- Open Access
- Published:
Asymptotically Pseudocontractions, Banach Operator Pairs and Best Simultaneous Approximations
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2011, Article number: 812813 (2011)
Abstract
The existence of common fixed points is established for the mappings where is asymptotically
-pseudo-contraction on a nonempty subset of a Banach space. As applications, the invariant best simultaneous approximation and strong convergence results are proved. Presented results are generalizations of very recent fixed point and approximation theorems of Khan and Akbar (2009), Chen and Li (2007), Pathak and Hussain (2008), and several others.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
We first review needed definitions. Let be a subset of a normed space
. The set
is called the set of best approximants to
out of
, where
. Suppose that
and
are bounded subsets of
. Then, we write

The number is called the Chebyshev radius of
w.r.t.
, and an element
is called a best simultaneous approximation of
w.r.t.
. If
, then
and
is the set of all best approximations,
, of
from
. We also refer the reader to Milman [1], and Vijayraju [2] for further details. We denote by
and
(
), the set of positive integers and the closure (weak closure) of a set
in
, respectively. Let
be mappings. The set of fixed points of
is denoted by
. A point
is a coincidence point (common fixed point) of
and
if
. The pair
is called
(1)commuting [3] if for all
,
(2)compatible (see [3, 4]) if whenever
is a sequence such that
for some
in
,
(3)weakly compatible if they commute at their coincidence points; that is, if whenever
,
(4)Banach operator pair, if the set is
-invariant, namely
. Obviously, commuting pair
is a Banach operator pair but converse is not true in general, see [5, 6]. If
is a Banach operator pair, then
need not be a Banach operator pair (see, e.g., [5, 7, 8]). The set
is called
-starshaped with
, if the segment
joining
to
is contained in
for all
. The map
defined on a
-starshaped set
is called affine if

Suppose that is
-starshaped with
and is both
- and
-invariant. Then,
and
are called,
(5)-subweakly commuting on
(see [9]) if for all
, there exists a real number
such that
,
(6)uniformly-subweakly commuting on
(see [10]) if there exists a real number
such that
, for all
and
. The map
is said to be demiclosed at 0 if, for every sequence
in
converging weakly to
and
converges to
, then
.
The classical Banach contraction principle has numerous generalizations, extensions and applications. While considering Lipschitzian mappings, a natural question arises whether it is possible to weaken contraction assumption a little bit in Banach contraction principle and still obtain the existence of a fixed point. In this direction the work of Edelstein [11], Jungck [3], Park [12–18] and Suzuki [19] is worth to mention.
Schu [20] introduced the concept of asymptotically pseudocontraction and proved the existence and convergence of fixed points for this class of maps (see also [21]). Recently, Chen and Li [5] introduced the class of Banach operator pairs, as a new class of noncommuting maps and it has been further studied by Hussain [6], Ćirić et al. [7], Khan and Akbar [22, 23] and Pathak and Hussain [8]. More recently, Zhou [24] established a demiclosedness principle for a uniformly -Lipschitzian asymptotically pseudocontraction map and as an application obtained a fixed point result for asymptotically pseudocontraction in the setup of a Hilbert space. In this paper, we are able to join the concepts of uniformly
-Lipschitzian, asymptotically
-pseudocontraction and Banach operator pair to get the result of Zhou [24] in the setting of a Banach space. As a consequence, the common fixed point and approximation results of Al-Thagafi [25], Beg et al. [10], Chidume et al. [26], Chen and Li [5], Cho et al. [27], Khan and Akbar [22, 23], Pathak and Hussain [8], Schu [28] and Vijayraju [2] are extended to the class of asymptotically
-pseudocontraction maps.
2. Main Results
Let be a real Banach space and
be a subset of
. Let
be mappings. Then
is called
(a)an -contraction if there exists
such that
for any
; if
, then
is called
-nonexpansive,
(b)asymptotically-nonexpansive [2] if there exists a sequence
of real numbers with
and
such that

for all and for each
; if
, then
is called
-asymptotically nonexpansive map,
(c)pseudocontraction if and only if for each , there exists
such that

where is the normalized duality mapping defined by

(d)strongly pseudocontraction if and only if for each , there exists
and
such that

(e)asymptotically-pseudocontractive if and only if for each
and
, there exists
and a constant
with
such that

If in (2.5), then
is called asymptotically
-pseudocontractive [20, 24, 27],
(f)uniformly-Lipschitzian if there exists some
such that

for all and for each
; if
, then
is called uniformly
-Lipschitzian [20, 24, 29].
The map is called uniformly asymptotically regular [2, 10] on
, if for each
, there exists
such that
for all
and all
.
The class of asymptotically pseudocontraction contains properly the class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and every asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is a uniformly -Lipschitzian [2, 24]. For further details, we refer to [21, 24, 27, 29, 30].
In 1974, Deimling [30] proved the following fixed point theorem.
Theorem D.
Let be self-map of a closed convex subset
of a real Banach space
. Assume that
is continuous strongly pseudocontractive mapping. Then,
has a unique fixed point.
The following result extends and improves Theorem 3.4 of Beg et al. [10], Theorem 2.10 in [22], Theorems 2.2 of [25] and Theorem 4 in [31].
Theorem 2.1.
Let be self-maps of a subset
of a real Banach space
. Assume that
is closed (resp., weakly closed) and convex,
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
. If
is compact (resp.,
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0) and
, then
.
Proof.
For each , define a self-map
on
by

where and
is a sequence of numbers in
such that
and
. Since
and
is convex with
, it follows that
maps
into
. As
is convex and
(resp.
), so
) (resp.
) for each
. Since
is a strongly pseudocontractive on
, by Theorem D, for each
, there exists
such that
. As
is bounded, so
as
. Now,

Since for each ,
and
, therefore
. Thus
. Also
is uniformly asymptotically regular, we have from (2.8)

as . Thus
as
. As
is compact, so there exists a subsequence
of
such that
as
. Since
is a sequence in
and
, therefore
. Moreover,

Taking the limit as , we get
. Thus,
proves the first case.
Since a weakly closed set is closed, by Theorem D, for each , there exists
such that
. The weak compactness of
implies that there is a subsequence
of
converging weakly to
as
. Since
is a sequence in
and
, so
. Moreover, we have,
as
. If
is demiclosed at 0, then
. Thus,
.
Remark 2.2.
By comparing Theorem 3.4 of Beg et al. [10] with the first case of Theorem 2.1, their assumptions " is closed and
-starshaped,
,
,
are continuous,
is linear,
,
is compact,
is asymptotically
-nonexpansive and
and
are uniformly
-subweakly commuting on
" are replaced with "
is nonempty set,
is closed, convex,
,
is compact,
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive".
If is weakly closed and
is weakly continuous, then
is weakly closed and hence closed, thus we obtain the following.
Corollary 2.3.
Let be self-maps of a weakly closed subset
of a Banach space
. Assume that
is weakly continuous,
is nonempty and convex,
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
. If
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0) and
is a Banach operator pair, then
.
A mapping on
is called pointwise asymptotically nonexpansive [32, 33] if there exists a sequence
of functions such that

for all and for each
where
pointwise on
.
An asymptotically nonexpansive mapping is pointwise asymptotically nonexpansive. A pointwise asymptotically nonexpansive map defined on a closed bounded convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space has a fixed point and
is closed and convex [32, 33]. Thus we obtain the following.
Corollary 2.4.
Let be a pointwise asymptotically nonexpansive self-map of a closed bounded convex subset
of a uniformly convex Banach space
. Assume that
is a self-map of
which is uniformly
-Lipschitzian, asymptotically
-pseudocontractive and uniformly asymptotically regular. If
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0) and
, then
.
Corollary 2.5 (see [24, Theorem 3.3]).
Let be self-map of a closed bounded and convex subset
of a real Hilbert space
. Assume that
is uniformly Lipschitzian and asymptotically pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
. Then,
.
Corollary 2.6.
Let be a Banach space and
and
be self-maps of
. If
,
,
is closed (resp. weakly closed) and convex,
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0),
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
, and
, then
.
Remark 2.7.
Corollary 2.6 extends Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 of Chen and Li [5] to a more general class of asymptotically -pseudocontractions.
Theorem 2.1 can be extended to uniformly -Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive map which extends Theorem 2.10 of [22] to asymptotically
- pseudocontractions.
Theorem 2.8.
Let be self-maps of a subset
of a Banach space
. Assume that
is closed (resp. weakly closed) and convex,
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
. If
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0) and
, then
.
Proof.
For each , define a self-map
on
by

where and
is a sequence of numbers in
such that
and
. Since
and
is convex with
, it follows that
maps
into
. As
is convex and
(resp.
), so
) (resp.
) for each
. Further, since
is a strongly pseudocontractive on
, by Theorem D, for each
, there exists
such that
. Rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.9.
Let be self-maps of a subset
of a Banach space
. Assume that
is closed (resp. weakly closed) and convex,
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
. If
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0) and
and
are Banach operator pairs, then
.
Corollary 2.10.
Let be a Banach space and
,
, and
be self-maps of
. If
,
, where
is the set of best simultaneous approximations of
w.r.t
. Assume that
is closed (resp. weakly closed) and convex,
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0),
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
, and
, then
.
Remark 2.11.
-
(1)
Theorem 2.2 and 2.7 of Khan and Akbar [23] are particular cases of Corollary 2.10.
-
(2)
By comparing Theorem 2.2 of Khan and Akbar [23] with the first case of Corollary 2.10, their assumptions "
is nonempty, compact, starshaped with respect to an element
,
is invariant under
,
and
,
and
are Banach operator pairs on
,
and
are
-starshaped with
,
and
are continuous and
is asymptotically
-nonexpansive on
," are replaced with "
,
is closed and convex,
,
is compact and
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive on
."
-
(3)
By comparing Theorem 2.7 of Khan and Akbar [23] with the second case of Corollary 2.10, their assumptions "
is nonempty, weakly compact, starshaped with respect to an element
,
is invariant under
,
and
,
and
are Banach operator pairs on
,
and
are
-starshaped with
,
and
are continuous under weak and strong topologies,
is demiclosed at 0 and
is asymptotically
-nonexpansive on
," are replaced with "
,
is weakly closed and convex,
,
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0 and
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive on
."
We denote by the class of closed convex subsets of
containing 0. For
, we define
=
. It is clear that
(see [9, 25]).
Theorem 2.12.
Let be self-maps of a Banach space
. If
and
such that
,
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact) and
for all
, then
is nonempty, closed and convex with
. If, in addition,
,
is closed (resp. weakly closed) and convex,
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact and
is demiclosed at 0),
is uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive which is also uniformly asymptotically regular on
, and
, then
.
Proof.
We may assume that . If
, then
. Note that

Thus, . If
is compact, then by the continuity of norm, we get
for some
.
If we assume that is weakly compact, using Lemma 5.5 in [34, page 192], we can show the existence of a
such that
.
Thus, in both cases, we have

for all . Hence
and so
is nonempty, closed and convex with
. The compactness of
(resp. weak compactness of
) implies that
is compact (resp.
is weakly compact). The result now follows from Theorem 2.8.
Remark 2.13.
Theorem 2.12 extends Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 in [25], Theorem 8 in [31], and Theorem 2.15 in [22].
Definition 2.14.
Let be a nonempty closed subset of a Banach space
,
be mappings and
. Then
and
are said to satisfy property
[10, 27] if the following holds: for any bounded sequence
in
,
implies
.
The normal structure coefficient of a Banach space
is defined [10, 26] by
, where
is the Chebyshev radius of
relative to itself and
is diameter of
. The space
is said to have the uniform normal structure if
. A Banach limit
is a bounded linear functional on
such that
and
for all bounded sequences
in
. Let
be bounded sequence in
. Then we can define the real-valued continuous convex function
on
by
for all
.
The following lemmas are well known.
Let be a Banach space with uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm and
. Let
be bounded sequence in
. Then
if and only if
for all
, where
is the normalized duality mapping and
denotes the generalized duality pairing.
Let be a convex subset of a smooth Banach space
,
be a nonempty subset of
and
be a retraction from
onto
. Then
is sunny and nonexpansive if and only if
for all
and
.
Now, we are ready to prove strong convergence to nearest common fixed points of asymptotically -pseudocontraction mappings.
Theorem 2.17.
Let be a subset of a reflexive real Banach space
with uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm. Let
and
be self-maps on
such that
is closed and convex,
is continuous, uniformly asymptotically regular, uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive with a sequence
. Let
be sequence of real numbers in
such that
and
. If
, then we have the following:
(A)For each , there is exactly one
in
such that

(B)If is bounded and
and
satisfy property
, then
converges strongly to
, where
is the sunny nonexpansive retraction from
onto
.
Proof.
Part (A) follows from the proof of Theorem 2.1.
-
(B)
As in Theorem 2.1, we get
. Since
is bounded, we can define a function
by
for all
. Since
is continuous and convex,
as
and
is reflexive,
for some
. Clearly, the set
is nonempty. Since
is bounded and
and
satisfy property
, it follows that
. Suppose that
, then by Lemma 2.15, we have
(2.16)
In particular, we have

From (2.8), we have

Now, for any , we have

for some . It follows from (2.18) that

Hence we have

This together with (2.17) implies that .
Thus there is a subsequence of
which converges strongly to
. Suppose that there is another subsequence
of
which converges strongly to
(say). Since
is continuous and
,
is a fixed point of
. It follows from (2.21) that

Adding these two inequalities, we get

Consequently, converges strongly to
. We can define now a mapping
from
onto
by
. From (2.21), we have
for all
and
. Thus by Lemma 2.16,
is the sunny nonexpansive retraction on
. Notice that
and
, so by the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 we obtain,
.
Remark 2.18.
Theorem 2.17 extends Theorem 1 in [27]. Notice that the conditions of the continuity and linearity of are not needed in Theorem 3.6 of Beg et al. [10]; moreover, we have obtained the conclusion for more general class of uniformly
-Lipschitzian and asymptotically
-pseudocontractive map
without any type of commutativity of
and
.
Corollary 2.19 (see [26, Theorem 3.1]).
Let be a closed convex bounded subset of a real Banach space
with uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm possessing uniform normal structure. Let
be an asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with a sequence
. Let
be fixed,
be sequence of real numbers in
such that
and
. Then,
(A)for each , there is unique
in
such that

(B)if , then
converges strongly to a fixed point of
.
Remark 2.20.
-
(1)
Theorem 2.17 improves and extends the results of Beg et al. [10], Cho et al. [27], and Schu [20, 28] to more general class of Banach operators.
-
(2)
It would be interesting to prove similar results in Modular Function Spaces (cf. [29]).
-
(3)
Let
with the usual norm and
. A mapping
is defined by
, for
and
, for
and
on
. Clearly,
is not
-nonexpansive [21]  (e.g.,
and
). But,
is a
-pseudocontractive mapping.
References
Milman PD: On best simultaneous approximation in normed linear spaces. Journal of Approximation Theory 1977,20(2):223–238. 10.1016/0021-9045(77)90077-6
Vijayraju P: Applications of fixed point theorem to best simultaneous approximations. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1993, 21–26.
Jungck G: Common fixed points for commuting and compatible maps on compacta. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1988,103(3):977–983. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0947693-2
Jungck G, Hussain N: Compatible maps and invariant approximations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,325(2):1003–1012. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.02.058
Chen J, Li Z: Common fixed-points for Banach operator pairs in best approximation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,336(2):1466–1475. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.01.064
Hussain N: Common fixed points in best approximation for Banach operator pairs with Ćirić type -contractions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,338(2):1351–1363. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.008
Ćirić L, Hussain N, Akbar F, Ume JS: Common fixed points for Banach operator pairs from the set of best approximations. Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society 2009,16(2):319–336.
Pathak HK, Hussain N: Common fixed points for Banach operator pairs with applications. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,69(9):2788–2802. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.051
Hussain N, Jungck G: Common fixed point and invariant approximation results for noncommuting generalized-nonexpansive maps. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006,321(2):851–861. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.08.045
Beg I, Sahu DR, Diwan SD: Approximation of fixed points of uniformly -subweakly commuting mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006,324(2):1105–1114. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.024
Edelstein M: On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings. Journal of the London Mathematical Society Second Series 1962, 37: 74–79. 10.1112/jlms/s1-37.1.74
Park S: A generalization of a theorem of Janos and Edelstein. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1977,66(2):344–346. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1977-0454907-7
Park S: Fixed points of -contractive maps. The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 1978,8(4):743–750. 10.1216/RMJ-1978-8-4-743
Park S: On -nonexpansive maps. Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society 1979–1980,16(1):29–38.
Park S: On general contractive-type conditions. Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society 1980/81,17(1):131–140.
Park S: Some general theorems on common fixed points. Kobe Journal of Mathematics 1988,4(2):141–145.
Park S: Best approximations and fixed points of nonexpansive maps in Hilbert spaces. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization. 1997,18(5–6):649–657.
Park S: A unified fixed point theory in generalized convex spaces. Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 2007,23(8):1509–1526. 10.1007/s10114-007-0947-3
Suzuki T: A generalized Banach contraction principle that characterizes metric completeness. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2008,136(5):1861–1869.
Schu J: Iterative construction of fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 1991,158(2):407–413. 10.1016/0022-247X(91)90245-U
Song Y: Iterative convergence to Cesà ro means for continuous pseudocontractive mappings. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,71(7–8):2792–2800. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.123
Khan AR, Akbar F: Best simultaneous approximations, asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and variational inequalities in Banach spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2009,354(2):469–477. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.01.007
Khan AR, Akbar F: Common fixed points from best simultaneous approximations. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics 2009,13(5):1379–1386.
Zhou H: Demiclosedness principle with applications for asymptotically pseudo-contractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,70(9):3140–3145. 10.1016/j.na.2008.04.017
Al-Thagafi MA: Common fixed points and best approximation. Journal of Approximation Theory 1996,85(3):318–323. 10.1006/jath.1996.0045
Chidume CE, Li J, Udomene A: Convergence of paths and approximation of fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2005,133(2):473–480. 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07538-0
Cho YJ, Sahu DR, Jung JS: Approximation of fixed points of asymptotically pseudocontractive mappings in Banach spaces. Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 2003, (2):49–59.
Schu J: Approximation of fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1991,112(1):143–151. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1991-1039264-7
Khamsi MA, Kozlowski WM: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in modular function spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2010,73(9):2957–2967. 10.1016/j.na.2010.06.061
Deimling K: Zeros of accretive operators. Manuscripta Mathematica 1974, 13: 365–374. 10.1007/BF01171148
Habiniak L: Fixed point theorems and invariant approximations. Journal of Approximation Theory 1989,56(3):241–244. 10.1016/0021-9045(89)90113-5
Hussain N, Khamsi MA: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,71(10):4423–4429. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.126
Kirk WA, Xu H-K: Asymptotic pointwise contractions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,69(12):4706–4712. 10.1016/j.na.2007.11.023
Singh S, Watson B, Srivastava P: Fixed Point Theory and Best Approximation: The KKM-Map Principle, Mathematics and Its Applications. Volume 424. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1997:x+220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, N. Asymptotically Pseudocontractions, Banach Operator Pairs and Best Simultaneous Approximations. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2011, 812813 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/812813
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/812813
Keywords
- Convex Subset
- Fixed Point Theorem
- Nonexpansive Mapping
- Lipschitzian Mapping
- Modular Function