# Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces

## Abstract

In the article, we introduce a new concept of contraction and prove a fixed point theorem which generalizes Banach contraction principle in a different way than in the known results from the literature. The article includes an example which shows the validity of our results, additionally there is delivered numerical data which illustrates the provided example.

MSC: 47H10; 54E50

## 1 Introduction

Throughout the article denoted by is the set of all real numbers, by + is the set of all positive real numbers and by is the set of all natural numbers. (X, d), (X for short), is a metric space with a metric d.

In the literature, there are plenty of extensions of the famous Banach contraction principle , which states that every self-mapping T defined on a complete metric space (X, d) satisfying

(1)

has a unique fixed point and for every x0 X a sequence {Tnx0}nis convergent to the fixed point. Some of the extensions weaken right side of inequality in the condition (1) by replacing λ with a mapping, see e.g. [2, 3]. In other results, the underlying space is more general, see e.g . The Nadler's paper  started the invatigations concerning fixed point theory for set-valued contractions, see e.g. . There are many theorems regarding asymptotic contractions, see e.g. , contractions of Meir-Keeler type , see e.g [19, 23, 25] and weak contractions, see e.g. . There are also lots of different types of fixed point theorems not mentioned above extending the Banach's result.

In the present article, using a mapping F: + we introduce a new type of contraction called F-contraction and prove a new fixed point theorem concerning F-contraction. For the concrete mappings F, we obtain the contractions of the type known from the literature, Banach contraction as well. The article includes the examples of F-contractions and an example showing that the obtained extension is significant. Theoretical considerations that we support by computational data illustrate the nature of F-contractions.

## 2 The result

Definition 2.1 Let F: + be a mapping satisfying:

(F1) F is strictly increasing, i.e. for all α, β + such that α < β, F (α) < F (β);

(F2) For each sequence {α n }nof positive numbers limn→∞α n = 0 if and only if limn→∞F (α n ) = -∞;

(F3) There exists k (0, 1) such that limα→0+ αkF(α) = 0.

A mapping T: XX is said to be an F-contraction if there exists τ > 0 such that

${\forall }_{x,y\in X}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(Tx,Ty\right)>0⇒\tau +F\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(Tx,Ty\right)\right)\le F\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(x,y\right)\right)\right).$
(2)

When we consider in (2) the different types of the mapping F then we obtain the variety of contractions, some of them are of a type known in the literature. See the following examples:

Example 2.1 Let F : + be given by the formula F (α) = ln α. It is clear that F satisfies (F1)-(F3) ((F3) for any k (0, 1)). Each mapping T : XX satisfying (2) is an F-contraction such that

(3)

It is clear that for x, y X such that Tx = Ty the inequality d(Tx, Ty) ≤ e-τd(x, y) also holds, i.e. T is a Banach contraction .

Example 2.2 If F(α) = ln α + α, α > 0 then F satisfies (F1)-(F3) and the condition (2) is of the form

(4)

Example 2.3 Consider $F\left(\alpha \right)=-1/\sqrt{\alpha }$, α > 0. F satisfies (F1)-(F3) ((F3) for any k (1/2, 1)). In this case, each F-contraction T satisfies

Here, we obtained a special case of nonlinear contraction of the type d(Tx, Ty) ≤ α(d(x, y))d(x, y). For details see [2, 3].

Example 2.4 Let F(α) = ln(α2 + α), α > 0. Obviously F satisfies (F1)-(F3) and for F-contraction T, the following condition holds:

Let us observe that in Examples 2.1-2.4 the contractive conditions are satisfied for x, y X, such that Tx = Ty.

Remark 2.1 From (F1) and (2) it is easy to conclude that every F-contraction T is a contractive mapping, i.e.

Thus every F-contraction is a continuous mapping.

Remark 2.2 Let F1, F2 be the mappings satisfying (F1)-(F3). If F1(α) ≤ F2(α) for all α > 0 and a mapping G = F2 - F1 is nondecreasing then every F1-contraction T is F2-contraction.

Indeed, from Remark 2.1 we have G(d(Tx, Ty)) ≤ G(d(x, y)) for all x, y X, TxTy. Thus, for all x, y X, TxTy we obtain

$\begin{array}{ll}\hfill \tau +{F}_{2}\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(Tx,Ty\right)\right)& =\tau +{F}_{1}\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(Tx,Ty\right)\right)+G\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(Tx,Ty\right)\right)\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\\ \le {F}_{1}\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(x,y\right)\right)+G\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(x,y\right)\right)={F}_{2}\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(x,y\right)\right).\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\end{array}$

Now we state the main result of the article.

Theorem 2.1 Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and let T : XX be an F-contraction. Then T has a unique fixed point x* X and for every x0 X a sequence {Tnx0}nis convergent to x*.

Proof. First, let us observe that T has at most one fixed point. Indeed, if ${x}_{1}^{*}$, ${x}_{2}^{*}\in X$, $T{x}_{1}^{*}={x}_{1}^{*}\ne {x}_{2}^{*}=T{x}_{2}^{*}$, then we get

$\tau \le F\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({x}_{1}^{*},{x}_{2}^{*}\right)\right)-F\left(\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T{x}_{1}^{*},T{x}_{2}^{*}\right)\right)=0,$

In order to show that T has a fixed point let x0 X be arbitrary and fixed. We define a sequence {x n }n X, xn+1= Tx n , n = 0, 1, .... Denote γ n = d(xn+1, x n ), n = 0, 1, ....

If there exists n0 for which ${x}_{{n}_{0}+1}={x}_{{n}_{0}}$, then $T{x}_{{n}_{0}}={x}_{{n}_{0}}$ and the proof is finished.

Suppose now that xn+1x n , for every n . Then γ n > 0 for all n and, using (2), the following holds for every n :

$F\left({\gamma }_{n}\right)\le F\left({\gamma }_{n-1}\right)-\tau \le F\left({\gamma }_{n-2}\right)-2\tau \le \dots \le F\left({\gamma }_{0}\right)-n\tau .$
(5)

From (5), we obtain limn→∞F(γ n ) = -∞ that together with (F2) gives

$\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}{\gamma }_{n}=0.$
(6)

From (F3) there exists k (0, 1) such that

$\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}F\left({\gamma }_{n}\right)=0.$
(7)

By (5), the following holds for all n :

${{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}F\left({\gamma }_{n}\right)-{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}F\left({\gamma }_{0}\right)\le {{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}\left(F\left({\gamma }_{0}\right)-n\tau \right)-{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}F\left({\gamma }_{0}\right)=-{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}n\tau \le 0.$
(8)

Letting n → ∞ in (8), and using (6) and (7), we obtain

$\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}n{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}=0.$
(9)

Now, let us observe that from (9) there exists n1 such that $n{{\gamma }_{n}}^{k}\le 1$ for all nn1. Consequently we have

(10)

In order to show that {x n }nis a Cauchy sequence consider m, n such that m > nn1. From the definition of the metric and from (10) we get

$\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({x}_{m},{x}_{n}\right)\le {\gamma }_{m-1}+{\gamma }_{m-2}+\cdots +{\gamma }_{n}<\sum _{i=n}^{\infty }{\gamma }_{i}\le \sum _{i=n}^{\infty }\frac{1}{{i}^{1/k}}.$

From the above and from the convergence of the series ${\sum }_{i=1}^{\infty }1/{i}^{\frac{1}{k}}$ we receive that {x n }nis a Cauchy sequence.

From the completeness of X there exists x* X such that limn→∞x n = x*. Finally, the continuity of T yields

$\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T{x}^{*},{x}^{*}\right)=\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T{x}_{n},{x}_{n}\right)=\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{n}\right)=0,$

which completes the proof. □

Note that for the mappings F1(α) = ln(α), α > 0, F2(α) = ln(α) + α, α > 0, F1< F2 and a mapping F2 - F1 is strictly increasing. Hence, by Remark 2.2, we obtain that every Banach contraction (3) satisfies the contraction condition (4). On the other side in Example 2.5, we present a metric space and a mapping T which is not F1-contraction (Banach contraction), but still is an F2-contraction. Consequently, Theorem 2.1 gives the family of contractions which in general are not equivalent.

Example 2.5 Consider the sequence {S n }nas follows:

$\begin{array}{l}{S}_{1}=1,\\ {S}_{2}=1+2,\\ \dots \\ {S}_{n}=1+2+\cdots +n=\frac{n\left(n+1\right)}{2},n\in ℕ,\\ \dots \end{array}$

Let X = {S n : n } and d(x, y) = |x - y|, x, y X. Then (X, d) is a complete metric space. Define the mapping T : XX by the formulae:

$\begin{array}{l}T\left({S}_{n}\right)={S}_{n-1}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{for}}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}n>1,\\ T\left({S}_{1}\right)={S}_{1}.\end{array}$

First, let us consider the mapping F1 defined in Example 2.1. The mapping T is not the F1-contraction in this case (which actually means that T is not the Banach contraction). Indeed, we get

$\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}\frac{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T\left({S}_{n}\right),T\left({S}_{1}\right)\right)}{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({S}_{n},{S}_{1}\right)}=\underset{n\to \infty }{\mathsf{\text{lim}}}\frac{{S}_{n-1}-1}{{S}_{n}-1}=1.$

On the other side taking F2 as in Example 2.2, we obtain that T is F2-contraction with τ = 1. To see this, let us consider the following calculations:

First, observe that

${\forall }_{m,n\in ℕ}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\left[T\left({S}_{m}\right)\ne T\left({S}_{n}\right)⇔\left(\left(m>2\wedge n=1\right)\vee \left(m>n>1\right)\right)\right].$

For every m , m > 2 we have

$\begin{array}{ll}\hfill \frac{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T\left({S}_{m}\right),T\left({S}_{1}\right)\right)}{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({S}_{m},{S}_{1}\right)}{e}^{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T\left({S}_{m}\right),T\left({S}_{1}\right)\right)-\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({S}_{m},{S}_{1}\right)}& =\frac{{S}_{m-1}-1}{{S}_{m}-1}{e}^{{S}_{m-1}-{S}_{m}}\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\\ =\frac{{m}^{2}-m-2}{{m}^{2}+m-2}{e}^{-m}<{e}^{-m}<{e}^{-1}.\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\end{array}$

For every m, n , m > n > 1 the following holds

$\begin{array}{ll}\hfill \frac{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T\left({S}_{m}\right),T\left({S}_{n}\right)\right)}{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({S}_{m},{S}_{n}\right)}{e}^{\mathsf{\text{d}}\left(T\left({S}_{m}\right),T\left({S}_{n}\right)\right)-\mathsf{\text{d}}\left({S}_{m},{S}_{n}\right)}& =\frac{{S}_{m-1}-{S}_{n-1}}{{S}_{m}-{S}_{n}}{e}^{{S}_{n}-{S}_{n-1}+{S}_{m-1}-{S}_{m}}\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\\ =\frac{m+n-1}{m+n+1}{e}^{n-m}<{e}^{n-m}\le {e}^{-1}.\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\end{array}$

Clearly S1 is a fixed point of T. To see the computational data confirming the above calculations the reader is referred to Table 1.

## References

1. Banach S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux équations intégrales. Fund Math 1922, 3: 133–181.

2. Boyd DW, Wong JSW: On nonlinear contractions. Proc Am Math Soc 1969, 20: 458–464. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1969-0239559-9

3. Rakotch E: A note on contractive mappings. Proc Am Math Soc 1962, 13: 459–465. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1962-0148046-1

4. Arandjelović I, Kadelburg Z, Radenović S: Boyd-Wong-type common fixed point results in cone metric spaces. Appl Math Comput 2011, 217: 7167–7171. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.113

5. Huang LG, Zhang X: Cone metric spaces and fixed point theorems of contractive maps. J Math Anal Appl 2007, 332: 1467–1475.

6. Kadelburg Z, Radenović S, Rakočević V: Remarks on "Quasi-contraction on a cone metric space. Appl Math Lett 2009, 22: 1674–1679. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.06.003

7. Tarafdar E: An approach to fixed-point theorems on uniform spaces. Trans Am Math Soc 1974, 191: 209–225.

8. Nadler SB Jr: Multi-valued contraction mappings. Pac J Math 1969, 30: 475–488.

9. Ćirić L: Multi-valued nonlinear contraction mappings. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 71: 2716–2723. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.116

10. Feng Y, Liu S: Fixed point theorems for multi-valued contractive mappings and multi-valued Caristi type mappings. J Math Anal Appl 2006, 317: 103–112. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.004

11. Klim D, Wardowski D: Fixed point theorems for set-valued contractions in complete metric spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2007, 334: 132–139. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.12.012

12. Mizoguchi N, Takahashi W: Fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings on complete metric spaces. J Math Anal Appl 1989, 141: 177–188. 10.1016/0022-247X(89)90214-X

13. Reich S: Fixed points of contractive functions. Boll Unione Mat Ital 1972, 5: 26–42.

14. Reich S: Approximate selections, best approximations, fixed points, and invariant sets. J Math Anal Appl 1978, 62: 104–113. 10.1016/0022-247X(78)90222-6

15. Türkoglu D: Fisher B: Fixed point of multivalued mapping in uniform spaces. Proc Indian Acad Sci (Math Sci) 2003, 113: 183–187. 10.1007/BF02829768

16. Wardowski D: Endpoints and fixed points of set-valued contractions in cone metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 71: 512–516. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.089

17. Wardowski D: On set-valued contractions of Nadler type in cone metric spaces. Appl Math Lett 2011, 24: 275–278. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.10.003

18. Włodarczyk K, Obczyński C, Wardowski D: Set-valued dynamic systems and random iterations of set-valued weaker contractions in uniform spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2006, 318: 772–780. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.047

19. Włodarczyk K, Plebaniak R, Obczyński C: The uniqueness of endpoints for set-valued dynamical systems of contractions of Meir-Keeler type in uniform spaces. Nonlinear Anal 2007, 67: 3373–3383. 10.1016/j.na.2006.10.019

20. Zhong CK, Zhu J, Zhao PH: An extension of multi-valued contraction mappings and fixed points. Proc Am Math Soc 1999, 128: 2439–2444.

21. Jachymski J, Jóźwik I: On Kirk's asymptotic contractions. J Math Anal Appl 2004, 300: 147–159. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.06.037

22. Kirk WA: Fixed points of asymptotic contractions. J Math Anal Appl 2003, 277: 645–650. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00612-1

23. Suzuki T: Fixed-point theorem for asymptotic contractions of Meir-Keeler type in complete metric spaces. Non-linear Anal 2006, 64: 971–978.

24. Meir A, Keeler E: A theorem on contraction mappings. J Math Anal Appl 1969, 28: 326–329. 10.1016/0022-247X(69)90031-6

25. Agarwal RP, O'Regan D, Shahzad N: Fixed point theory for generalized contractive maps of Meir-Keeler type. Math Nachr 2004, 276: 3–22. 10.1002/mana.200310208

26. Abdeljawad T: Fixed points for generalized weakly contractive mappings in partial metric spaces. Math Comput Modelling 2011, 54: 2923–2927. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.013

27. Abdeljawad T, Karapinar E, Taş K: Existence and uniqueness of a common fixed point on partial metric spaces. Appl Math Lett 2011, 24: 1900–1904. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.05.014

28. Choudhury, Binayak S, Konar P, Rhoades BE, Metiya N: Fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive mappings. Nonlinear Anal 2011, 74: 2116–2126. 10.1016/j.na.2010.11.017

## Acknowledgements

The author is very grateful to the reviewers for their insightful reading the manuscript and valuable comments. This article was financially supported by University of Łódź as a part of donation for the research activities aimed in the development of young scientists.

## Author information

Authors

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariusz Wardowski.

### Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Wardowski, D. Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2012, 94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-94

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-94

### Keywords

• F-contraction
• contractive mapping
• fixed point
• complete metric space 