- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Approximate fixed points of generalized convex contractions
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 255 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce the concept of generalized convex contractions and give some results about approximate fixed points of the contractions on metric spaces. By providing some examples, we show that our results are real generalization of the main results of Ghorbanian et al. (Comput. Math. Appl. 63:1361-1368, 2012) and Istratescu (I. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 130(4):89-104, 1982).
1 Introduction
Istratescu [1] introduced the notion of convex contraction. He proved that each convex contraction has a unique fixed point on a complete metric space, see also [2]. Recently Ghorbanian, Rezapour and Shahzad generalized his results to complete ordered metric spaces, [3]. In recent years, there have appeared some works on approximate fixed point results (see, for example, [4–8] and the references therein). In this paper, by considering the key work [9] and using the main idea of [10], we introduce the concept of generalized convex contractions and generalize the main results of [3] and [1].
2 Preliminaries
Let be a metric space, T be a selfmap on X and be a mapping.
In accordance with [10], we say that T is α-admissible whenever implies . Also, we say that X has the property (H) whenever for each , there exists such that and ; also see [11].
The selfmap T on X is called a generalized convex contraction whenever there exist a mapping and , with , such that
for all .
We say that α is the based mapping. Also, we say that the selfmap T on X is a generalized convex contraction of order 2 whenever there exist a mapping and with such that
for all . Other useful references: [12–15].
Let be given. is an ε-fixed point of the selfmap T on X whenever , see [16]. Denote the set of all ε-fixed points of T by . We say that T has an approximate fixed point (or T has the approximate fixed point property) whenever T has an ε-fixed point for all , see [17]. It is known that there are selfmaps which have approximate fixed points while have no fixed points.
We need the following result in our main results.
Lemma 2.1 ([18])
Let be a metric space and T be an asymptotic regular selfmap on X, that is, for all . Then T has the approximate fixed point property.
3 The main results
Now, we are ready to state and prove our main results.
Theorem 3.1 Let be a metric space and T be a generalized convex contraction on X with the based mapping α. Suppose that T is α-admissible and there exists such that .
Then T has an approximate fixed point.
Moreover, T has a fixed point whenever T is continuous and is a complete metric space, and also T has a unique fixed point whenever X has the property (H).
Proof Let be such that . Define the sequence by for all .
If for some n, then we have nothing to prove.
Assume that for all . Since T is α-admissible, it is easy to check that for all n. Let and . Then . Now, put and . Then
By continuing this process and using a similar technique to that in the proof of Theorem 3 in [2], it is easy to see that , where or for all . This implies that .
By using Lemma 2.1, T has an approximate fixed point.
Also following arguments analogous to those in Theorem 3 in [2], it is easy to see that for all . This shows that is a Cauchy sequence.
If T is continuous and is a complete metric, then there exists such that . Thus, and so .
Now, suppose that X has also the property (H). We show that T has a unique fixed point.
Let and be fixed points of T. Choose such that and . Since T is α-admissible, and for all . Put and . Then we have
and
Also, we have
and one can easily get that .
By continuing this process, we obtain , where or for all . Hence, . Similarly, we can show that . Thus, we get and so T has a unique fixed point. □
In 2011, Haghi, Rezapour and Shahzad proved that some fixed point generalizations are not real generalizations [9]. But the following examples show that the notion of generalized convex contractions is a real generalization for the notions of convex contractions and ordered convex contractions which were provided, respectively, in [3] and [1].
Example 3.1 Let , and T be a selfmap on X defined by , and . Then, by putting , , and , we have . Thus, T is not a convex contraction, while by putting whenever and otherwise, and , it is easy to see that T is a generalized convex contraction.
Example 3.2 Let , . Define the order ≤ on X by and define the selfmap T on X by , and . Then, by putting and , and , we have
If and or and , then we have
and
Thus, T does not satisfy the condition of Theorem 2.4 in [3]. If we put and and define whenever and otherwise, then it is easy to see that T is a generalized convex contraction.
Theorem 3.2 Let be a metric space and T be a generalized convex contraction of order 2 on X with the based mapping α. Suppose that T is α-admissible and there exists such that .
Then T has an approximate fixed point.
Moreover, T has a fixed point whenever T is continuous and is a complete metric space, and also T has a unique fixed point whenever X has the property (H).
Proof Let be such that . Define the sequence by for all .
If for some n, then we have nothing to prove.
Assume that for all . Since T is α-admissible, it is easy to check that for all n. Let , and . Then we have
Hence, .
Now, put and . Then
Hence, .
Similarly, we obtain and .
By continuing this process and following an argument similar to that in Theorem 4 in [2] (see also [1]), it is easy to see that , where or for or , where or for . Thus, .
By using Lemma 2.1, T has an approximate fixed point.
Now, suppose that T is continuous and is a complete metric space. Then, by using a similar technique to that in the proof of Theorem 4 in [2] (see also [1]), it is easy to see that is a Cauchy sequence. Choose such that . Since T is continuous, and so . If X has the property (H), then by using a similar technique to that in the proof of Theorem 3.1, we can prove uniqueness of the fixed point of T. □
Again, the following examples show that the notion of generalized convex contractions of order 2 is a real generalization for the notions of convex contractions of order 2 and ordered convex contractions of order 2, which were provided, respectively, in [1] and [3].
Example 3.3 Let , and T be a selfmap on X defined by , and . Then, by putting , and , we have
Thus, T is not a convex contraction of order 2, while by putting whenever and otherwise and , it is easy to see that T is a generalized convex contraction of order 2.
Example 3.4 Let , , and T be a selfmap on X defined by , and . Then, by putting , and , we have
Thus, T is not an ordered convex contraction of order 2 which has been used in Theorem 2.5 of [3], while by putting whenever and otherwise and , it is easy to check that the selfmap T is a generalized convex contraction of order 2.
Recently, the notion of weakly Zamfirescu mappings was provided in [19] (see also Zamfirescu [20]).
Definition 3.1 Let be a metric space and T be a selfmap on X. Then T is called weakly Zamfirescu whenever there exists with
for all , such that for all , where
Now, by using the main idea of this paper, we define α-weakly Zamfirescu selfmaps as follows.
Let be a metric space, be a function and T be a selfmap on X. Then T is called α-weakly Zamfirescu whenever there exists with for all such that for all .
Theorem 3.3 Let be a metric space, be a function and T be an α-weakly Zamfirescu selfmap on X. Suppose that T is α-admissible and there exists such that .
Then T has an approximate fixed point.
Moreover, T has a fixed point whenever T is continuous and is a complete metric space.
Proof Let be such that . Define the sequence by for all . We show that for all . Since T is α-admissible, it is easy to check that for all n. But, for each n, we have
If , then
If , then
If , then
and so
Thus, the claim is proved.
This implies that the sequence is non-increasing and so it converges to the real number .
We have to show that .
Let . Since for all n, for all n, where . Hence,
for all n. But this is impossible because and . Therefore, T has an approximate fixed point.
Now, suppose that is a complete metric space and T is continuous. Following arguments similar to those in Theorem 28 of [19], we can show that is a Cauchy sequence. This implies easily that T has a fixed point. □
The following examples show that there exist α-weakly Zamfirescu mappings which are not weakly Zamfirescu.
Example 3.5 Let , , and let the selfmap T on X be defined by for all . Since for each existent map γ in the definition of weakly Zamfirescu mapping, T is not weakly Zamfirescu. Now, by putting and for all , it is easy to check that T is α-weakly Zamfirescu.
Example 3.6 Let , , and let the selfmap T on X be defined by whenever and whenever . Since for each existent map γ in the definition of weakly Zamfirescu mappings, T is not weakly Zamfirescu. Now, by putting and for all , it is easy to check that T is α-weakly Zamfirescu.
References
Istratescu VI: Some fixed point theorems for convex contraction mappings and mappings with convex diminishing diameters. I. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1982, 130(4):89–104.
Alghamdi MA, Alnafei SH, Radenović S, Shahzad N: Fixed point theorems for convex contraction mappings on cone metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54: 2020–2026. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.05.010
Ghorbanian V, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some ordered fixed point results and the property (P). Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 63: 1361–1368. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.071
Barroso CS, Lin PK: On the weak-approximate fixed point property. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 365: 171–175. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.10.007
Cabada A, Nieto JJ: Fixed points and approximate solutions for nonlinear operator equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 113: 17–25. 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00240-X
Chen CM, Chang TH, Huang YH: Approximate fixed point theorems for the generalized Ψ-set contraction mappings on an almost Φ-space. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 152–155. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.003
Kalenda OFK:Spaces not containing have weak approximate fixed point property. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 373: 134–137. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.06.052
Kirk WA: Remarks on approximate fixed points. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 75(12):4632–4636.
Haghi RH, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some fixed point generalizations are not real generalizations. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 1799–1803. 10.1016/j.na.2010.10.052
Samet B, Vetro C, Vetro P: Fixed-point theorems for α - ψ -contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 2154–2165. 10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014
Nawab H, Karapınar E, Salimi P, Akbar F: α -admissible mappings and related fixed point theorems. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 114
Alnafei SH, Radenović S, Shahzad N: Fixed point theorems for mappings with convex diminishing diameters on cone metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 2162–2166. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.06.019
Karapınar E, Samet B: Generalized α - ψ contractive type mappings and related fixed point theorems with applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 793486
Mohammadi B, Rezapour S, Shahzad N: Some results on fixed points of α - ψ -Ciric generalized multifunctions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 24
Radojević S, Paunović L, Radenović S: Abstract metric spaces and Hardy-Rogers-type theorems. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 553–558. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.11.012
Reich S: Approximate selections, best approximations, fixed points, and invariant sets. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1978, 62: 104–113. 10.1016/0022-247X(78)90222-6
Kohlenbach U, Leustean L: The approximate fixed point property in product spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2007, 66: 806–818. 10.1016/j.na.2005.12.020
Berinde M: Approximate fixed point theorems. Stud. Univ. Babeş–Bolyai, Math. 2006, 51(1):11–25.
Ariza-Ruiza D, Jimenez-Melado A, Lopez-Acedo G: A fixed point theorem for weakly Zamfirescu mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 1628–1640. 10.1016/j.na.2010.10.033
Zamfirescu T: Fixed point theorems in metric spaces. Arch. Math. 1972, 23: 292–298. 10.1007/BF01304884
Acknowledgements
Research of the first and third authors was supported by Azarbaidjan Shahid Madani University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors completed the paper together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Miandaragh, M.A., Postolache, M. & Rezapour, S. Approximate fixed points of generalized convex contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-255
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-255