 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Fclosed sets and coupled fixed point theorems without the mixed monotone property
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 330 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper we present the notion of Fclosed set (which is weaker than the concept of Finvariant set introduced in Samet and Vetro (Ann. Funct. Anal. 1:4656, 2010), and we prove some coupled fixed point theorems without the condition of mixed monotone property. Furthermore, we interpret the transitive property as a partial preorder and, then, some results in that paper and in Sintunavarat et al. (Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012:170, 2012) can be reduced to the unidimensional case.
MSC:46T99, 47H10, 47H09, 54H25.
1 Introduction
One of the very popular tools of a fixed point theory is the Banach contraction principle which first appeared in 1922. It states that if (X,d) is a complete metric space and T:X\to X is a contraction mapping (i.e., d(Tx,Ty)\le kd(x,y) for all x,y\in X, where k is a nonnegative number such that k<1), then T has a unique fixed point. Several mathematicians have been dedicated to improvement and generalization of this principle. In recent times, one of the most attractive research topics in fixed point theory is to prove the existence of a fixed point on metric spaces endowed with partial orders. An initial result in this direction was given by Turinici [1] in 1986. Following this line of research, Ran and Reurings [2] (and, later, Nieto and RodríguezLópez [3]) used a partial order on the ambient metric space to introduce a slightly different contractivity condition, which must be only verified by comparable points. Thus, they reported two versions of the Banach contraction principle in partially ordered sets and applied them to the study of some applications to matrix equations.
Since then, different extensions to coupled, tripled, quadrupled and multidimensional cases have appeared [4–28]. One of the common properties of all these results is the fact that the mapping F:{X}^{n}\to X must verify the mixed monotone property. Searching for a generalization of this kind of theorems, Samet and Vetro [29] succeeded in proving some results in which the mapping F did not necessarily have the mixed monotone property. To do that, they introduced the notion of Finvariant set. Later, Sintunavarat, Kumam and Cho [30] used this property in order to prove some coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions without the mixed monotone property.
In this note we observe that the Finvariant property introduced in [29] can be interpreted as a partial preorder and, then, some results in that paper and in [30] can be reduced to the unidimensional case.
2 Preliminaries
Henceforth, let X be a nonempty set. Given a positive integer n, let {X}^{n} be the product space X\times X\times \stackrel{n}{\cdots}\times X. We will use m to denote nonnegative integers. Unless otherwise stated, ‘for all m’ will mean ‘for all m\ge 0’.
Definition 1 (Roldán et al. [31])
A preorder (or a quasiorder) ≼ on X is a binary relation on X that is reflexive (i.e., x\preccurlyeq x for all x\in X) and transitive (if x,y,z\in X verify x\preccurlyeq y and y\preccurlyeq z, then x\preccurlyeq z). In such a case, we say that (X,\preccurlyeq ) is a preordered space (or a preordered set). If a preorder ≼ is also antisymmetric (x\preccurlyeq y and y\preccurlyeq x imply x=y), then ≼ is called a partial order.
Throughout this manuscript, let (X,d) be a metric space, and let ≼ be a preorder (or a partial order) on X.
Definition 2 (Roldán [32])
If (X,\preccurlyeq ) is a preordered space, a mapping T:X\to X is ≼nondecreasing if Tx\preccurlyeq Ty for all x,y\in X such that x\preccurlyeq y.
In 2003, Ran and Reurings proved the following version of the Banach theorem applicable to metric spaces endowed with a partial order.
Theorem 3 (Ran and Reurings [2])
Let (X,\preccurlyeq ) be an ordered set endowed with a metric d, and let T:X\to X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(a)
(X,d) is complete.

(b)
T is ≼nondecreasing.

(c)
T is continuous.

(d)
There exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\preccurlyeq T{x}_{0}.

(e)
There exists a constant k\in (0,1) such that d(Tx,Ty)\le kd(x,y) for all x,y\in X with x\succcurlyeq y.
Then T has a fixed point. Moreover, if for all (x,y)\in {X}^{2} there exists z\in X such that x\preccurlyeq z and y\preccurlyeq z, we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.
Later, Nieto and RodríguezLópez slightly modified the hypothesis of the previous result swapping condition (c) by the fact that (X,d,\preccurlyeq ) is nondecreasingregular in the following sense.
Definition 4 We will say that (X,d,\preccurlyeq ) is nondecreasingregular (respectively, nonincreasingregular) if any ≼nondecreasing (respectively, ≼nonincreasing) sequence \{{x}_{m}\} dconverges to x\in X, we have that {x}_{m}\preccurlyeq x (respectively, {x}_{m}\succcurlyeq x) for all m. And (X,d,\preccurlyeq ) is regular if it is both nondecreasingregular and nonincreasingregular.
Inspired by Boyd and Wong’s theorem [33], Mukherjea [34] introduced the following kind of control functions:
and proved a version of the following result in which the space is not necessarily endowed with a partial order (but the contractivity condition holds over all pairs of points of the space).
Theorem 5 Let (X,\preccurlyeq ) be an ordered set endowed with a metric d, and let T:X\to X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(a)
(X,d) is complete.

(b)
T is ≼nondecreasing.

(c)
Either T is continuous or (X,d,\preccurlyeq ) is nondecreasingregular.

(d)
There exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\preccurlyeq T{x}_{0}.

(e)
There exists \phi \in \mathrm{\Phi} such that d(Tx,Ty)\le \phi (d(x,y)) for all x,y\in X with x\succcurlyeq y.
Then T has a fixed point. Moreover, if for all (x,y)\in {X}^{2} there exists z\in X such that x\preccurlyeq z and y\preccurlyeq z, we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.
Some generalizations of the previous result can be found in Wang [35] (to the multidimensional case), in Romaguera [36] (to partial metric spaces, but not necessarily provided with a partial order) and in Roldán [32].
In order to guarantee the existence and uniqueness of a solution of periodic boundary value problems, Gnana Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham (and, subsequently, Lakshmikantham and Ćirić, see [37]) proved, in 2006, existence and uniqueness of a coupled fixed point (a notion introduced by Guo and Lakshmikantham) in the setting of partially ordered metric spaces by introducing the notion of mixed monotone property.
Definition 6 (Guo and Lakshmikantham [38])
We call an element (x,y)\in X\times X a coupled fixed point of the mapping F:X\times X\to X if
In order to ensure the existence of coupled fixed points, Gnana Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham introduced the following condition.
Definition 7 (Gnana Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [39])
Let (X,\preccurlyeq ) be a partially ordered set and F:X\times X\to X. We say that F has the mixed monotone property if F(x,y) is monotone nondecreasing in x and is monotone nonincreasing in y, that is, for any x,y\in X,
Many results were proved to ensure the existence of a coupled fixed point. One of the common properties of all these results is the fact that the mapping F:X\times X\to X must verify the mixed monotone property. Searching for a generalization of this kind of theorems, Samet and Vetro [29] succeeded in proving some results in which the mapping F did not necessarily have the mixed monotone property.
Definition 8 (Samet and Vetro [29])
Let (X,d) be a metric space and F:X\times X\to X be a given mapping. Let M be a nonempty subset of {X}^{4}. We say that M is an Finvariant subset of {X}^{4} if, for all x,y,z,w\in X,

(i)
(x,y,z,w)\in M\u27fa(w,z,y,x)\in M;

(ii)
(x,y,z,w)\in M\u27f9(F(x,y),F(y,x),F(z,w),F(w,z))\in M.
The following theorem is the main result in [29].
Theorem 9 (Samet and Vetro [29])
Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, F:X\times X\to X be a continuous mapping and M be a nonempty subset of {X}^{4}. We assume that

(i)
M is Finvariant;

(ii)
there exists ({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in {X}^{2} such that (F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}),{x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in M;

(iii)
for all (x,y,u,v)\in M, we have
\begin{array}{r}d(F(x,y),F(u,v))\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le \frac{\alpha}{2}[d(x,F(x,y))+d(y,F(y,x))]\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+\frac{\beta}{2}[d(u,F(u,v))+d(v,F(v,u))]+\frac{\theta}{2}[d(x,F(u,v))+d(y,F(v,u))]\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+\frac{\gamma}{2}[d(u,F(x,y))+d(v,F(y,x))]+\frac{\delta}{2}[d(x,u)+d(y,v)],\end{array}
where α, β, θ, γ, δ are nonnegative constants such that \alpha +\beta +\theta +\gamma +\delta <1.
Then F has a coupled fixed point, i.e., there exists (x,y)\in X\times X such that F(x,y)=x and F(y,x)=y.
Later, Sintunavarat et al. [30] introduced the notion of transitive property so as to extend the Lakshmikantham and Ćirić’s theorem (see [37]).
Definition 10 (Sintunavarat et al. [30])
Let (X,d) be a metric space and M be a subset of {X}^{4}. We say that M satisfies the transitive property if, for all x,y,z,w,a,b\in X,
Then they proved the following result.
Theorem 11 (Sintunavarat et al. [30])
Let (X,d) be a complete metric space and M be a nonempty subset of {X}^{4}. Assume that there is a function \phi :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) with 0=\phi (0)<\phi (t)<t and {lim}_{r\to {t}^{+}}\phi (r)<t for each t>0, and also suppose that F:X\times X\to X is a mapping such that
for all (x,y,u,v)\in M. Suppose that either

(a)
F is continuous or

(b)
if for any two sequences \{{x}_{m}\}, \{{y}_{m}\} with ({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1},{x}_{m},{y}_{m})\in M,
\{{x}_{m}\}\to x,\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\{{y}_{m}\}\to y,
for all m\ge 1, then (x,y,{x}_{m},{y}_{m})\in M for all m\ge 1.
If there exists ({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in X\times X such that (F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}),{x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in M and M is an Finvariant set which satisfies the transitive property, then there exist x,y\in X such that x=F(x,y) and y=F(y,x), that is, F has a coupled fixed point.
In recent times, it has been proved that many coupled, tripled and quadrupled results can be reduced to the unidimensional case, that is, to Theorems 3 and 5 (see, for instance, Samet et al. [40], Agarwal et al. [41] and Roldán et al. [42]). Furthermore, in some cases, it is not necessary to consider a partial order, but a preorder (see Roldán et al. [31] and Roldán [32]).
In this paper we observe that if M\subseteq {X}^{4} is Finvariant and has the transitive property, we could induce a preorder on {X}^{2} such that Theorem 11 can be seen as an easy consequence of Theorem 5.
3 Main results
In this section we extend some of the previous results using a weaker notion than Finvariant set. Throughout this section, let X be a nonempty set, let F:X\times X\to X be a mapping, and let M be a subset of {X}^{4}.
3.1 Fclosed sets and a related fixed point theorem
We extend the notion of Finvariant set as follows.
Definition 12 We say that M is an Fclosed subset of {X}^{4} if, for all x,y,u,v\in X,
Obviously, every Finvariant set is an Fclosed set. In particular, ∅ and {X}^{4} are Fclosed sets.
Example 13 Let X=\{0,1\}, and let M=\{(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0)\}\subseteq {X}^{4}. If we consider the mapping F:X\times X\to X given by F(x,y)=0 for all x,y\in X, then M is Fclosed, but it is not Finvariant.
In Lemma 18 we will show some nontrivial examples of Fclosed sets. The following result presents a characterization of Fclosed sets.
Lemma 14 Let X be a nonempty set, let F:X\times X\to X be a mapping, and let M be a subset of {X}^{4}. Define:
Then the following properties hold.

(1)
{\u2291}_{M} is reflexive whatever M.

(2)
M satisfies the transitive property if and only if {\u2291}_{M} is a preorder on {X}^{2}.

(3)
M is Fclosed if and only if the mapping {T}_{F} is {\u2291}_{M}nondecreasing.

(4)
If M is Finvariant, then the mapping {T}_{F} is {\u2291}_{M}nondecreasing.
Proof (1) is obvious. (2) Suppose that M satisfies the transitive property, and let (x,y){\u2291}_{M}(u,v) and (u,v){\u2291}_{M}(a,b). If (x,y)=(u,v) or (u,v)=(a,b), then it is apparent that (x,y){\u2291}_{M}(a,b). In other case, (u,v,x,y)\in M and (a,b,u,v)\in M. Since M satisfies the transitive property, then (a,b,x,y)\in M, which means that {\u2291}_{M} is a preorder on {X}^{2}. The converse is similar. (3) Suppose that M is Fclosed. Let (x,y),(u,v)\in {X}^{2} be such that (x,y){\u2291}_{M}(u,v). If (x,y)=(u,v), then it is clear that {T}_{F}(x,y)={T}_{F}(u,v). Now suppose that (u,v,x,y)\in M. Since M is Fclosed, we know that (F(u,v),F(v,u),F(x,y),F(y,x))\in M, that is, (F(x,y),F(y,x)){\u2291}_{M}(F(u,v),F(v,u)), which means that {T}_{F}(x,y){\u2291}_{M}{T}_{F}(u,v). Therefore, {T}_{F} is {\u2291}_{M}nondecreasing. The converse is similar. (4) It follows from the fact that M is also Fclosed. □
Notice that if d is a metric on X, then the mapping {D}_{d}:{X}^{2}\times {X}^{2}\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}), defined by
is a metric on {X}^{2}. Furthermore, if F:X\times X\to X is a dcontinuous mapping, then {T}_{F}:{X}^{2}\to {X}^{2}, defined as in (2), is {D}_{d}continuous. Thus, the following result reduces a coupled fixed point theorem to a unidimensional case.
Theorem 15 Theorem 11 follows from Theorem 5.
Proof Let Y=X\times X={X}^{2}, provided with the metric {D}_{d} and the preorder {\u2291}_{M}. It is clear that (Y,{D}_{d}) is a complete metric space, and Lemma 14 assures us that {T}_{F} is {\u2291}_{M}nondecreasing. The condition (F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}),{x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in M means that the point {Z}_{0}=({x}_{0},{y}_{0}) verifies {Z}_{0}{\u2291}_{M}{T}_{F}({Z}_{0}). If F is dcontinuous, then {T}_{F} is {D}_{d}continuous. Taking into account that \{({x}_{m},{y}_{m})\} {D}_{d}converges to (x,y)\in Y if and only if \{{x}_{m}\} dconverges to x and \{{y}_{m}\} dconverges to y, it is clear that condition (b) in Theorem 11 implies that (Y,{D}_{d},{\u2291}_{M}) is nondecreasingregular. Finally, suppose that (x,y),(u,v)\in Y verify (x,y){\u2291}_{M}(u,v) and we are going to show that
Indeed, if (x,y)=(u,v), there is nothing to prove. Suppose that (x,y)\ne (u,v). In this case, (u,v,x,y)\in M. By (1),
Moreover, by condition (i) in Definition 8, we have
and using (1) again, it follows that
Combining the previous inequalities, we deduce that
Using Theorem 5, we conclude that {T}_{F} has a fixed point, that is, F has a coupled fixed point. □
3.2 Fixed point results without the mixed monotone property
In the previous result, M is Finvariant and satisfies the transitive property. Next we show that these conditions are not necessary in order to prove coupled fixed point theorems. Therefore, we can prove some results avoiding such property.
Theorem 16 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, let F:X\times X\to X be a continuous mapping, and let M be a subset of {X}^{4}. Assume that:

(i)
M is Fclosed;

(ii)
there exists ({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in {X}^{2} such that (F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}),{x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in M;

(iii)
there exists k\in [0,1) such that for all (x,y,u,v)\in M, we have
d(F(x,y),F(u,v))+d(F(y,x),F(v,u))\le k(d(x,u)+d(y,v)).
Then F has a coupled fixed point.
Proof Using ({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in {X}^{2} and by recurrence, define {x}_{m+1}=F({x}_{m},{y}_{m}) and {y}_{m+1}=F({y}_{m},{x}_{m}) for all m\ge 0. We claim that ({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1},{x}_{m},{y}_{m})\in M for all m\ge 0. Indeed, ({x}_{1},{y}_{1},{x}_{0},{y}_{0})=(F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}),{x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in M. Assume that ({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1},{x}_{m},{y}_{m})\in M for some m\ge 0. Since M is Fclosed,
Applying the contractivity condition to ({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1},{x}_{m},{y}_{m})\in M, we deduce that, for all m\ge 0,
that is,
In other words,
This proves that \{{x}_{m}\} and \{{y}_{m}\} are Cauchy sequences in the complete metric space (X,d). Therefore, there are x,y\in X such that \{{x}_{m}\}\to x and \{{y}_{m}\}\to y. Since F is continuous, \{{x}_{m+1}\}=\{F({x}_{m},{y}_{m})\}\to F(x,y), so F(x,y)=x. Analogously, F(y,x)=y and (x,y) is a coupled fixed point of F. □
Example 17 Let X=[1,1] provided with the Euclidean metric. Let M={X}^{4}\setminus \{(0,0,0,1)\} and consider the mapping F:X\times X\to X given by F(x,y)=(xy)/4 for all x,y\in X. Then M is an Fclosed set but it is not an Finvariant set. Taking into account that, for all x,y,u,v\in X,
and choosing ({x}_{0},{y}_{0})=(1,1), we conclude that all hypotheses of Theorem 16 are verified. Then F has a coupled fixed point, which is (0,0), but Theorem 11 cannot be applied because M is not an Finvariant set.
The previous theorem also holds using a weaker contractivity condition. To introduce it, we need some notation. Given (x,y),(u,v)\in {X}^{2}, we will use, for simplicity, the notation
Given a point {Z}_{0}=({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in {X}^{2}, let {T}_{F}^{0}({Z}_{0})={Z}_{0}, {T}_{F}^{1}({Z}_{0})={T}_{F}({Z}_{0}) and {T}_{F}^{m+1}({Z}_{0})={T}_{F}({T}_{F}^{m}({Z}_{0})) for all m\ge 0. We will denote
Lemma 18 Given {Z}_{0}\in {X}^{2}, the set {M}_{F}({Z}_{0}) is Fclosed. Indeed, if M\subseteq {X}^{4} is an Fclosed set verifying ({T}_{F}({Z}_{0}),{Z}_{0})\in M, then {M}_{F}({Z}_{0})\subseteq M.
In particular,
Proof Let {Z}_{0}=({x}_{0},{y}_{0})\in {X}^{2} and define {x}_{m+1}=F({x}_{m},{y}_{m}) and {y}_{m+1}=F({y}_{m},{x}_{m}) for all m\ge 0. Let us prove that {T}_{F}^{m}({Z}_{0})=({x}_{m},{y}_{m}) for all m\ge 0. If m=0, it is obvious. If m=1, then ({x}_{1},{y}_{1})=(F({x}_{0},{y}_{0}),F({y}_{0},{x}_{0}))={T}_{F}({x}_{0},{y}_{0})={T}_{F}({Z}_{0}). By recurrence,
Next we claim that {M}_{F}({Z}_{0}) is Fclosed. Let (x,y,u,v)\in {M}_{F}({Z}_{0}). Then there exists m\ge 0 such that (x,y,u,v)=({T}_{F}^{m+1}({Z}_{0}),{T}_{F}^{m}({Z}_{0}))=({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1},{x}_{m},{y}_{m}). Therefore
Finally, let M\subseteq {X}^{4} be an Fclosed set verifying ({T}_{F}({Z}_{0}),{Z}_{0})\in M, and we are going to show that {M}_{F}({Z}_{0})\subseteq M. In particular, we will prove that ({T}_{F}^{m+1}({Z}_{0}),{T}_{F}^{m}({Z}_{0}))\in M for all m\ge 0 by the induction method. Indeed, if m=0, by hypothesis, ({T}_{F}({Z}_{0}),{Z}_{0})\in M. Suppose that ({T}_{F}^{m+1}({Z}_{0}),{T}_{F}^{m}({Z}_{0}))\in M for some m\ge 0. Since M is Fclosed,
Hence,
This completes the induction. Thus, {M}_{F}({Z}_{0})\subseteq M. □
If we particularize Theorem 16 to the Fclosed set M={M}_{F}({Z}_{0}), we obtain the following result.
Corollary 19 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, let F:X\times X\to X be a continuous mapping, and suppose that there exist {Z}_{0}\in {X}^{2} and k\in [0,1) such that
for all (x,y,u,v)\in {M}_{F}({Z}_{0}). Then F has a coupled fixed point.
Notice that in the previous result, we have not necessarily a partial order on X nor a mapping verifying the mixed monotone property.
Theorem 20 Theorem 9 follows from Corollary 19.
Proof Following the proof given in [29], we can consider a constant
and a sequence {\{({x}_{m+1},{y}_{m+1})=(F({x}_{m},{y}_{m}),F({y}_{m},{x}_{m}))\}}_{m\ge 0} such that
which is exactly condition (3). Then F has a coupled fixed point. □
References
Turinici M: Abstract comparison principles and multivariable GronwallBellman inequalities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1986, 117: 100–127.
Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 1435–1443.
Nieto JJ, RodríguezLópez R: Contractive mapping theorem in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005, 22: 223–239.
Abbas M, Khan MA, Radenović S: Common coupled fixed point theorem in cone metric space for w compatible mappings. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 217: 195–202.
Abbas M, Ali B, Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Tripled fixed point and tripled coincidence point theorems in intuitionistic fuzzy normed spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 187
Abbas M, Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Coupled fixed point of generalized contractive mappings on partially ordered G metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 31
Agarwal RP, Karapinar E: A note on ‘Coupled fixed point theorems for α  ψ contractive type mappings in partially ordered metric spaces’. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 216
AminiHarandi A: Coupled and tripled fixed point theory in partially ordered metric spaces with applications to initial value problem. Math. Comput. Model. 2013, 57: 2343–2348.
Aydi H, Abbas M, Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Tripled fixed point of W compatible mappings in abstract metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 134
Berinde V: Generalized coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2011, 74: 7347–7355.
Chandok S, Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Some coupled common fixed points for a pair of mappings in partially ordered G metric spaces. Math. Sci. 2013., 7: Article ID 24
Đorić D, Kadelburg Z, Radenović S: Coupled fixed point results for mappings without mixed monotone property. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 1803–1808.
Golubović Z, Kadelburg Z, Radenović S: Coupled coincidence points of mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 192581
Kadelburg Z, Nashine HK, Radenović S: Common coupled fixed point results in partially ordered G metric spaces. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 4: 51–63.
Kadelburg Z, Nashine HK, Radenović S: Some new coupled fixed point results in 0complete ordered partial metric spaces. J. Adv. Math. Stud. 2013, 6: 159–172.
Kadelburg Z, Radenović S: Coupled fixed point results under TVScone metric and W conedistance. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 29–46.
Pant BD, Chauhan S, Vujaković J, Khan MA, Vetro C: A coupled fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space satisfying ϕ contractive condition. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2013., 2013: Article ID 826596
Karapınar E: Couple fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in cone metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59(12):3656–3668.
Karapınar E, Kumam P, Sintunavarat W: Coupled fixed point theorems in cone metric spaces with a c distance and applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 194
Radenović S: Remarks on some coupled coincidence point result in partially ordered metric spaces. Arab J. Math. Sci. 2013. 10.1016/j.ajmsc.2013.02.003
Radenović S: Remarks on some coupled fixed point results in partial metric spaces. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2013, 18: 39–50.
Radenović S: Remarks on some recent coupled coincidence point results in symmetric G metric spaces. J. Oper. 2013., 2013: Article ID 290525
Rajić, VĆ, Radenović, S: A note on tripled fixed point of wcompatible mappings in tvscone metric spaces. Thai J. Math. (2013, in press)
Sintunavarat W, Cho YJ, Kumam P: Coupled coincidence point theorems for contractions without commutative condition in intuitionistic fuzzy normed spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 81
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P: Coupled coincidence and coupled common fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces. Thai J. Math. 2012, 10(3):551–563.
Roldán A, MartínezMoreno J, Roldán C: Multidimensional fixed point theorems in partially ordered complete metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 396: 536–545.
Roldán A, MartínezMoreno J, Roldán C: Tripled fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces and applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 29
Roldán A, MartínezMoreno J, Roldán C, Karapınar E: MeirKeeler type multidimensional fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 406026
Samet B, Vetro C: Coupled fixed point F invariant set and fixed point of N order. Ann. Funct. Anal. 2010, 1: 46–56.
Sintunavarat W, Kumam P, Cho YJ: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions without mixed monotone property. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 170
Roldán A, Karapınar E:Some multidimensional fixed point theorems on partially preordered {G}^{\ast}metric spaces under (\psi ,\varphi )contractivity conditions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 158
Roldán, A: Some coincidence/fixed point theorems under Φcontractivity conditions without an underlying metric structure and applications (submitted)
Boyd DW, Wong JSW: On nonlinear contractions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1969, 20: 458–464.
Mukherjea A: Contractions and completely continuous mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 1997, 1(3):235–247.
Wang S: Coincidence point theorems for G isotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 96
Romaguera S: Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions on partial metric spaces. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159(1):194–199.
Lakshmikantham V, Ćirić LJ: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70(12):4341–4349.
Guo D, Lakshmikantham V: Coupled fixed points of nonlinear operators with applications. Nonlinear Anal. 1987, 11: 623–632.
Gnana Bhaskar T, Lakshmikantham V: Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications. Nonlinear Anal. 2006, 65(7):1379–1393.
Samet B, Karapınar E, Aydi H, Rajic C: Discussion on some coupled fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 50
Agarwal R, Karapınar E: Remarks on some coupled fixed point theorems in G metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 2
Roldán, A, MartínezMoreno, J, Roldán, C, Karapınar, E: Some remarks on multidimensional fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory (accepted for publication)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kutbi, M.A., Roldán, A., Sintunavarat, W. et al. Fclosed sets and coupled fixed point theorems without the mixed monotone property. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 330 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013330
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013330