 Research
 Open access
 Published:
A note on Caristitype cyclic maps: related results and applications
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 344 (2013)
Abstract
In this note, we first introduce the concept of Caristitype cyclic map and present a new convergence theorem and a best proximity point theorem for Caristitype cyclic maps. It should be mentioned that in our results, the dominated functions need not possess the lower semicontinuity property. Some best proximity point results and convergence theorems in the literature have been derived from our main results. Consequently, the presented results improve, extend and generalize some of the existence results on the topic.
MSC:37C25, 47H09, 45H10, 54H25.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Cyclic maps were introduced by Kirk, Srinavasan and Veeramani [1] in 2003 to extend the celebrated Banach contraction principle [2]: In a complete metric space (X,d), every contraction T:X\to X has a unique fixed point. In this principle, the mapping T is necessarily continuous. In the context of cyclic mapping, the authors [1] observed the analog of Banach contraction principle for discontinuous mapping. Cyclic maps and related fixed point theorems have been investigated densely by a number of authors who have been interested in nonlinear analysis.
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a nonempty set S. A map T:A\cup B\to A\cup B is called a cyclic map if T(A)\subseteq B and T(B)\subseteq A. Let (X,d) be a metric space and T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be a cyclic map. We denote the distance of the nonempty subsets A and B of X by
A point x\in A\cup B is said to be a best proximity point for T if d(x,Tx)=dist(A,B). A map T:A\cup B\to A\cup B is called a cyclic contraction if the following conditions hold:

(i)
T(A)\subseteq B and T(B)\subseteq A;

(ii)
There exists k\in (0,1) such that d(Tx,Ty)\le kd(x,y)+(1k)dist(A,B) for all x\in A,y\in B.
In the last decade, a number of generalizations in various directions on the existence and uniqueness of a best proximity point were investigated by several authors (see, e.g., [1, 3–13] and references therein). In particular, Eldred and Veeramani [3] obtained the following interesting best proximity point result.
Theorem 1.1 ([[3], Proposition 3.2])
Let A and B be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X. Let T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be a cyclic contraction map, {x}_{1}\in A and define {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n}, n\in \mathbb{N}. Suppose that \{{x}_{2n1}\} has a convergent subsequence in A. Then there exists x\in A such that d(x,Tx)=dist(A,B).
In 1976, Caristi [14] proved the following remarkable result that is one of the most valuable and applicable generalizations of the Banach contraction principle.
Theorem 1.2 (Caristi’s fixed point theorem [14])
Let (X,d) be a complete metric space and f:X\to \mathbb{R} be a lower semicontinuous and bounded below function. Suppose that T is a Caristitype map on X dominated by f; that is, T satisfies
Then T has a fixed point in X.
Caristi’s fixed point theorem has various applications in nonlinear sciences since it is an important diversity and equivalence of Ekeland’s variational principle [15, 16] and Takahashi’s nonconvex minimization theorem [17, 18]. Due to its application potential, Caristi’s fixed point theorem has been investigated, extended, generalized and improved in various ways by several authors; see, e.g., [17–26] and references therein. Very recently, in [25], the first author established some new fixed point theorems for Caristitype maps. Indeed, the author [25] considered some suitable generalized distances without assuming that the dominated functions possess the lower semicontinuity property. More precisely, he utilized the new versions of Caristitype fixed point theorem to deal with the existence results for any map T satisfying
where \alpha :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) is a function satisfying {lim\hspace{0.17em}sup}_{s\to {t}^{+}}\alpha (s)<1 for all t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}); for more detail, one can refer to [25].
In this note, we first introduce the concept of Caristitype cyclic map and present a new convergence theorem to achieve a best proximity point theorem for Caristitype cyclic maps. It should be mentioned that in this paper we remove the lower semicontinuity property of the dominated functions in Caristitype cyclic maps. As interesting applications of our results, we show that some results in the literature, such as [3, 12] and others, are concluded from both the new convergence theorem and the best proximity point theorem. The results of this paper extend, improve and generalize some wellknown results on the topic in the literature.
2 New results for Caristitype cyclic maps
Throughout this paper, we denote by ℕ and ℝ the sets of positive integers and real numbers, respectively. Let (X,d) be a metric space. An extended realvalued function \varphi :X\to (\mathrm{\infty},+\mathrm{\infty}] is said to be lower semicontinuous (l.s.c. for short) at w\in X if for any sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X with {x}_{n}\to w as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, we have \varphi (w)\le {lim\hspace{0.17em}inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\varphi ({x}_{n}). The function ϕ is called to be l.s.c. on X if ϕ is l.s.c. at every point of X. The function ϕ is said to be proper if \varphi \not\equiv +\mathrm{\infty}.
In this paper, we first introduce the concept of Caristitype cyclic map.
Definition 2.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and f:A\cup B\to (\mathrm{\infty},+\mathrm{\infty}] and \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) be functions. A selfmap T:A\cup B\to A\cup B is called a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ on A\cup B if the following conditions are satisfied :

(CC1)
T(A)\subseteq B and T(B)\subseteq A,

(CC2)
d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)\le \phi (f(x))(f(x)f(Tx)) for all x\in A\cup B.
In particular, if condition (CC2) is replaced with the following condition:
(CC3) d(x,Tx)dist(A,B)\le f(x)f(Tx) for all x\in A\cup B (that is, \phi (t)=1 for all t\in \mathbb{R} in (CC2)),
then T is called a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f on A\cup B.
Example 2.1 Let X=(10,10) with the usual metric d(x,y)=xy. Then (X,d) is a metric space. Let A=[1,5] and B=[5,1] be nonempty subsets of (X,d). Clearly, dist(A,B)=2. Let f:A\cup B\to \mathbb{R} and \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) be defined by
and
respectively. Let T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be defined by
Then T(A)\subseteq B and T(B)\subseteq A (i.e., (CC1) holds). We claim that T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ, but not a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f. We consider the following four possible cases.
Case 1. For x\in [1,3), we have
Case 2. For x\in [3,5], we have
Case 3. For x\in (3,1], we have
Case 4. For x\in [5,3], we have
By Cases 14, we verify that
that is, (CC2) holds. So, T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Notice that
which means that (CC3) does not hold. Therefore T is not a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f.
The following convergence theorem is one of the main results of this paper.
Theorem 2.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). Assume that \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a nondecreasing function and f:A\cup B\to (\mathrm{\infty},+\mathrm{\infty}] is a proper function which is bounded below. If T:A\cup B\to A\cup B is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ, then for any u\in A\cup B with f(u)<+\mathrm{\infty}, the sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in A\cup B defined by {x}_{1}=u and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N} satisfies the following conditions:

(a)
f({x}_{n+1})\le f({x}_{n})<+\mathrm{\infty} for each n\in \mathbb{N},

(b)
d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})dist(A,B)\le \phi (f({x}_{n}))(f({x}_{n})f({x}_{n+1})) for all n\in \mathbb{N},

(c)
{lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=dist(A,B).
Proof Let S=\{x\in A\cup B:f(x)<+\mathrm{\infty}\}. Since f is proper, S\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}. Let u\in S. Define {x}_{1}=u and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n}={T}^{n}u for each n\in \mathbb{N}. Clearly, we have f({x}_{1})<+\mathrm{\infty} for {x}_{1}=u. Without loss of generality, we may assume {x}_{1}\in A. By (CC1), we have {x}_{2n1}\in A and {x}_{2n}\in B for all n\in \mathbb{N}. Clearly,
From (CC2) we have
which implies
Similarly, we have
and
Hence, by induction, we can obtain the following inequalities:
and
Consequently, we have that (a) and (b) hold. Finally, let us prove (c). Since f is bounded below,
Since φ is nondecreasing, by (2.3), we have
Taking into account (2.1), (2.2), (2.4) and (2.5), we get
Since {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}f({x}_{n})=\gamma, the last inequality implies
So, we conclude that (c) holds. The proof is completed. □
Applying Theorem 2.1, we establish the following new best proximity point theorem for Caristitype cyclic maps.
Theorem 2.2 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). Suppose that \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) is a nondecreasing function and f:A\cup B\to (\mathrm{\infty},+\mathrm{\infty}] is a proper function that is bounded below. Let u\in A with f(u)<+\mathrm{\infty} and T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Define a sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in A\cup B by {x}_{1}=u and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. Suppose that one of the following conditions is satisfied:

(H1)
T is continuous on A\cup B;

(H2)
d(Tx,Ty)\le d(x,y) for any x\in A and y\in B;

(H3)
The map g:X\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by g(x)=d(x,Tx) is l.s.c.
Then the following statements hold.

(a)
If \{{x}_{2n1}\} has a convergent subsequence in A, then there exists v\in A such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).

(b)
If \{{x}_{2n}\} has a convergent subsequence in B, then there exists v\in B such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).
Proof Applying Theorem 2.1, we have
Since {x}_{1}=u\in A, we have {x}_{2n1}\in A and {x}_{2n}\in B for all n\in \mathbb{N}. Let us prove the conclusion (a). Assume that \{{x}_{2n1}\} has a convergent subsequence \{{x}_{2{n}_{k}1}\} in A. Hence there exists v\in A such that {x}_{2{n}_{k}1}\to v as k\to \mathrm{\infty} or
Clearly, we have
Taking into account (2.6), (2.7) and (2.8), we get
Now, we verify d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B). Suppose that (H1) holds. By the continuity of T, we derive
By (2.9) and (2.10), we get d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).
If (H2) holds, since
and (2.9), we find that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).
Finally, assume that (H3) holds. By the lower semicontinuity of g, {x}_{2{n}_{k}1}\to v as k\to \mathrm{\infty} and (2.6), we obtain
which implies d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).
Following a similar argument as in the proof of (a), one can also show the desired conclusion (b). □
Here, we give an example illustrating Theorem 2.2.
Example 2.2 Let X, A, B, f, φ and T be the same as in Example 2.1. Hence T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Note that f is not lower semicontinuous at x=3 and −3, so f is not lower semicontinuous on A\cup B. Since f(x)\ge 100 for all x\in A\cup B, f is a bounded below function on A\cup B. By the definition of T, we know that T is continuous on A\cup B. Hence (H1) as in Theorem 2.2 holds. It is obvious that
On the other hand, let {x}_{1}=1\in A and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. Then we have {x}_{2n1}=1\in A and {x}_{2n}=1\in B for all n\in \mathbb{N}. So \{{x}_{2n1}\} and \{{x}_{2n}\} have convergent subsequences in A and B, respectively. Therefore, all the assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied. Applying Theorem 2.2, we also prove that there exist v\in A and w\in B (precisely speaking, v=1 and w=1) such that d(v,Tv)=d(w,Tw)=dist(A,B).
3 Some applications
A function α: [0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) is said to be an \mathcal{MT}function (or ℛfunction) [12, 25–30] if {lim\hspace{0.17em}sup}_{s\to {t}^{+}}\alpha (s)<1 for all t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}). It is obvious that if α: [0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) is a nondecreasing function or a nonincreasing function, then α is an \mathcal{MT}function. So the set of \mathcal{MT}functions is a rich class.
Recently, Du [28] first proved the following characterizations of \mathcal{MT}functions which are quite useful for proving our main results.
Theorem D ([[28], Theorem 2.1])
Let \alpha :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) be a function. Then the following statements are equivalent.

(a)
α is an \mathcal{MT}function.

(b)
For each t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), there exist {r}_{t}^{(1)}\in [0,1) and {\epsilon}_{t}^{(1)}>0 such that \alpha (s)\le {r}_{t}^{(1)} for all s\in (t,t+{\epsilon}_{t}^{(1)}).

(c)
For each t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), there exist {r}_{t}^{(2)}\in [0,1) and {\epsilon}_{t}^{(2)}>0 such that \alpha (s)\le {r}_{t}^{(2)} for all s\in [t,t+{\epsilon}_{t}^{(2)}].

(d)
For each t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), there exist {r}_{t}^{(3)}\in [0,1) and {\epsilon}_{t}^{(3)}>0 such that \alpha (s)\le {r}_{t}^{(3)} for all s\in (t,t+{\epsilon}_{t}^{(3)}].

(e)
For each t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), there exist {r}_{t}^{(4)}\in [0,1) and {\epsilon}_{t}^{(4)}>0 such that \alpha (s)\le {r}_{t}^{(4)} for all s\in [t,t+{\epsilon}_{t}^{(4)}).

(f)
For any nonincreasing sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), we have 0\le {sup}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\alpha ({x}_{n})<1.

(g)
α is a function of contractive factor; that is, for any strictly decreasing sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), we have 0\le {sup}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\alpha ({x}_{n})<1.
Let us recall the concept of \mathcal{MT}cyclic contractions introduced first by Du and Lakzian [12].
Definition 3.1 [12]
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d). If a map T:A\cup B\to A\cup B satisfies

(MT1)
T(A)\subseteq B and T(B)\subseteq A;

(MT2)
there exists an \mathcal{MT}function α: [0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) such that
d(Tx,Ty)\le \alpha (d(x,y))d(x,y)+(1\alpha (d(x,y)))dist(A,B)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{for any}x\in A\text{and}y\in B,
then T is called an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction with respect to α on A\cup B.
The following example shows that there exists an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction which is not a cyclic contraction.
Example 3.1 [12]
Let X=\{{v}_{1},{v}_{2},{v}_{3},\dots \} be a countable set and \{{\tau}_{n}\} be a strictly increasing convergent sequence of positive real numbers. Denote by {\tau}_{\mathrm{\infty}}:={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\tau}_{n}. Then {\tau}_{2}<{\tau}_{\mathrm{\infty}}. Let d:X\times X\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) be defined by d({v}_{n},{v}_{n})=0 for all n\in \mathbb{N} and d({v}_{n},{v}_{m})=d({v}_{m},{v}_{n})={\tau}_{m} if m>n. Then d is a metric on X. Set A=\{{v}_{1},{v}_{3},{v}_{5},\dots \}, B=\{{v}_{2},{v}_{4},{v}_{6},\dots \}. Define a map T:A\cup B\to A\cup B by
for n\in \mathbb{N} and define \alpha :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,1) by
Then T is an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction with respect to α, but not a cyclic contraction on A\cup B.
The following result tells us the relation between an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction and a Caristitype cyclic map.
Theorem 3.1 Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction with respect to α. Then there exist a bounded below function f:A\cup B\to \mathbb{R} and a nondecreasing function \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) such that T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ.
Proof Denote {T}^{0}=I (the identity mapping). Let x\in A\cup B be given. Define a sequence {\{{w}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in A\cup B by {w}_{1}=x and {w}_{n}=T{w}_{n}={T}^{n1}x for n\in \mathbb{N}. Clearly, the condition (MT2) implies that T satisfies
So from the last inequality we deduce
Hence the sequence \{d({w}_{n},{w}_{n+1})\} is nonincreasing in [0,\mathrm{\infty}). Since α is an \mathcal{MT}function, by (g) of Theorem D, we obtain
Since x\in A\cup B is arbitrary, we can define a new function \beta :A\cup B\to [0,1) by
Clearly, for each x\in A\cup B, we have
and
Let x\in A\cup B be given. Without loss of generality, we may assume x\in A. Then Tx\in B. By (MT2), we get
and hence
By exploiting inequalities (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), we obtain
Let \phi :\mathbb{R}\to [0,+\mathrm{\infty}) and f:A\cup B\to \mathbb{R} be defined by
and
respectively. Then φ is a nondecreasing function and f is a bounded below function. Clearly, f(x)<+\mathrm{\infty} for all x\in A\cup B. From (3.3), we obtain
which means that T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. □
Theorem 3.2 [12]
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction with respect to α. Then there exists a sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} such that
Proof Applying Theorem 3.1, there exist a bounded below function f:A\cup B\to \mathbb{R} and a nondecreasing function \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) such that T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Let u\in A\cup B be given. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset A\cup B be defined by {x}_{1}=u and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. Applying Theorem 2.1, we have
Since the condition (MT2) implies that T satisfies
we know that the sequence \{d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})\} is nonincreasing in [0,\mathrm{\infty}). By (3.4), we get
The proof is completed. □
Theorem 3.3 [12]
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space (X,d) and T:A\cup B\to A\cup B be an \mathcal{MT}cyclic contraction with respect to α. For a given {x}_{1}\in A, define an iterative sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} by {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. Suppose that \{{x}_{2n1}\} has a convergent subsequence in A, then there exists v\in A such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B).
Proof Applying Theorem 3.1, there exist a bounded below function f:A\cup B\to \mathbb{R} and a nondecreasing function \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) such that T is a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ. Let u={x}_{1}\in A be given. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset A\cup B be defined by {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. Since the condition (MT2) implies the condition (H2) as in Theorem 2.2, all the assumptions of Theorem 2.2 are satisfied. By applying (a) of Theorem 2.2, there exists v\in A such that d(v,Tv)=dist(A,B). □
Remark 3.1 ([[3], Proposition 3.2])
(i.e., Theorem 1.1) is a special case of Theorem 3.3.
Finally, applying Theorem 2.1, we can establish a new Caristitype fixed point theorem without assuming that the dominated functions possess the lower semicontinuity property.
Theorem 3.4 Let M be a nonempty subset of a metric space (X,d), f:M\to (\mathrm{\infty},+\mathrm{\infty}] be a proper and bounded below function, \phi :\mathbb{R}\to (0,+\mathrm{\infty}) be a nondecreasing function and T:M\to M be a selfmap on X. Suppose that T is of Caristi type on M dominated by φ and f, that is,
Then there exists a sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} in M such that {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} is Cauchy.
Moreover, if (X,d) is complete and M is closed in X, and one of the following conditions is satisfied:

(D1)
T is continuous on M;

(D2)
T is closed, that is, GrT=\{(x,y)\in M\times M:y=Tx\}, the graph of T, is closed in M\times M;

(D3)
T he map g:X\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by g(x)=d(x,Tx) is l.s.c.
Then the mapping T admits a fixed point in X, and for any u\in X with f(u)<+\mathrm{\infty}, the sequence {\{{T}^{n}u\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} converges to a fixed point of T.
Proof Let A=B=M. Then we have A\cup B=M, T(A)\subseteq B, T(B)\subseteq A and dist(A,B)=0. So (3.5) implies
Hence T a Caristitype cyclic map dominated by f and φ on A\cup B. Since f is proper, there exists u\in M=A\cup B such that f(u)<+\mathrm{\infty}. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset M be defined by {x}_{1}=u and {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for n\in \mathbb{N}. By applying Theorem 2.1, we have

(a)
f({x}_{n+1})\le f({x}_{n})<+\mathrm{\infty} for each n\in \mathbb{N},

(b)
d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})\le \phi (f({x}_{n}))(f({x}_{n})f({x}_{n+1})) for all n\in \mathbb{N},

(c)
{lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0.
Since φ is nondecreasing, by (a), we have
Since f is bounded below and the sequence {\{f({x}_{n})\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} is nonincreasing in [0,+\mathrm{\infty}),
For m>n with m,n\in \mathbb{N}, taking into account (3.5), (3.6) and (3.7), we get
Let {\lambda}_{n}=\phi (f({x}_{1}))(f({x}_{n})\gamma ), n\in \mathbb{N}. Then
Since {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}f({x}_{n})=\gamma, {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{\lambda}_{n}=0. From (3.8) we obtain
which proves that {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} is a Cauchy sequence in M.
Moreover, assume that (X,d) is complete and M is closed in X. So (M,d) is a complete metric space. By the completeness of M, there exists {v}_{u}\in M such that {x}_{n}\to {v}_{u} as n\to \mathrm{\infty}. We claim {v}_{u}\in \mathcal{F}(T). If (D1) holds, since T is continuous on M, {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for each n\in \mathbb{N} and {x}_{n}\to {v}_{u} as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, we get
If (D2) holds, since T is closed, {x}_{n+1}=T{x}_{n} for each n\in \mathbb{N} and {x}_{n}\to {v}_{u} as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, we have T{v}_{u}={v}_{u}. Finally, assume that (D3) holds. Since {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1})=0, we obtain
we obtain d({v}_{u},T{v}_{u})=0 and hence T{v}_{u}={v}_{u}. This completes the proof. □
References
Kirk WA, Srinivasan PS, Veeramani P: Fixed points for mappings satisfying cyclical contractive conditions. Fixed Point Theory 2003, 4: 79–89.
Banach S: Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux equations itegrales. Fundam. Math. 1922, 3: 133–181.
Anthony Eldred A, Veeramani P: Existence and convergence of best proximity points. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 323: 1001–1006. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.10.081
Anthony Eldred A, Anuradha J, Veeramani P: On the equivalence of the MizoguchiTakahashi fixed point theorem to Nadler’s theorem. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 1539–1542. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.03.022
AlThagafi MA, Shahzad N: Convergence and existence results for best proximity points. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 3665–3671. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.022
Suzuki T, Kikkawa M, Vetro C: The existence of the best proximity points in metric spaces with the property UC. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 2918–2926. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.173
Jleli M, Karapinar E, Samet B: On best proximity points under the P property on partially ordered metric spaces. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 150970 10.1155/2013/150970
Karapinar E: On best proximity point of ψ Geraghty contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 200 10.1186/168718122013200
Jleli M, Karapinar E, Samet B: Best proximity points for generalized α  ψ proximal contractive type mappings. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 534127 10.1155/2013/534127
Karapinar E, Petruşel G, Tas K: Best proximity point theorems for KTtypes cyclic orbital contraction mappings. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 13(2):537–546.
Karapinar E: Best proximity points of cyclic mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 1761–1766. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.02.008
Du WS, Lakzian H: Nonlinear conditions for the existence of best proximity points. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 206 10.1186/1029242X2012206
Gabeleh M, Shahzad N: Existence and convergence theorems of best proximity points. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 101439 10.1155/2013/101439
Caristi J: Fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying inwardness conditions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1976, 215: 241–251.
Ekeland I: On the variational principle. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1974, 47: 324–353. 10.1016/0022247X(74)900250
Ekeland I: Nonconvex minimization problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1979, 1: 443–474. 10.1090/S027309791979145956
Takahashi W: Existence theorems generalizing fixed point theorems for multivalued mappings. Pitmam Research Notes in Mathematics Series 252. In Fixed Point Theory and Applications. Edited by: Théra MA, Baillon JB. Longman, Harlow; 1991:397–406.
Takahashi W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama; 2000.
Khamsi MA: Remarks on Caristi’s fixed point theorem. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 227–231. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.042
Jachymski JR: Caristi’s fixed point theorem and selections of setvalued contractions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 227: 55–67. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.6074
Kirk WA, Saliga LM: The BrézisBrowder order principle and extensions of Caristi’s theorem. Nonlinear Anal. 2001, 47: 2765–2778. 10.1016/S0362546X(01)003959
Petrusşel A, Sîntămărian A: Singlevalued and multivalued Caristi type operators. Publ. Math. (Debr.) 2002, 60: 167–177.
Feng Y, Liu S: Fixed point theorems for multivalued contractive mappings and multivalued Caristi type mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 317: 103–112. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.004
Karapinar E: Generalizations of Caristi Kirk’s theorem on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 4
Du WS: On Caristi type maps and generalized distances with applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 407219 10.1155/2013/407219
Du WS: On generalized weakly directional contractions and approximate fixed point property with applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 6 10.1186/1687181220126
Du WS: Some new results and generalizations in metric fixed point theory. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73: 1439–1446. 10.1016/j.na.2010.05.007
Du WS: On coincidence point and fixed point theorems for nonlinear multivalued maps. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159: 49–56. 10.1016/j.topol.2011.07.021
Du WS: New existence results and generalizations for coincidence points and fixed points without global completeness. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 214230 10.1155/2013/214230
Lin IJ, Chen TH: New existence theorems of coincidence points approach to generalizations of MizoguchiTakahashi’s fixed point theorem. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 124156 10.1186/168718122012156
Acknowledgements
The first author was supported by Grant No. NSC 1022115M017001 of the National Science Council of the Republic of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Both authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Du, WS., Karapinar, E. A note on Caristitype cyclic maps: related results and applications. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2013, 344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013344
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/168718122013344