 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
A note on recent cyclic fixed point results in dislocated quasibmetric spaces
Fixed Point Theory and Applications volume 2016, Article number: 74 (2016)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to establish some fixed point results for cyclic contractions in the setting of dislocated quasibmetric spaces. We verify that some previous cyclic contraction results in dislocated quasibmetric spaces are just equivalent to the noncyclic ones in the same spaces. Moreover, by using two examples, we highlight the superiority of the results obtained.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
French mathematician Poinćare was first to use the concept of fixed point in ‘Poinćare’s final theorem’ during the period of 1895 to 1900, from restricting the existence of periodic solution for three body problem to the existence of fixed point under some conditions of planar continuous transformations. In 1910, Brouwer proved that there exists at least one fixed point for the polyhedron continuous map in finite dimensional space, and this opened the situation of fixed point theory research. Particularly in 1922, Polish mathematician Banach innovated Banach contraction mapping principle by using Picard iteration method. Due to its beautiful assertion and successful way of solving the implicit function existence theorem, the existence of a solution for a differential equation with initial value condition, fixed point theory caught the eyes of scholars and it sparkles people’s inspirations towards indepth and extensive research. Especially in recent decades, with the development of the computer, many people have coped with numerous applications by utilizing a variety of iteration methods to approach the fixed point and hence they made a breakthrough and brought this subject gradually to perfection. Nowadays fixed point theory plays a crucial role in nonlinear functional analysis. Just because of this, in this paper, we start our fixed point investigation based on some previous work.
To start this article, we first of all recall some basic knowledge.
In 1922, Banach [1] introduced the Banach contraction mapping principle as follows:
A selfmap T on a metric space \(( X,d )\) has a unique fixed point if there exists \(k\in[0,1)\) such that
After that, based on this finding, a large number of fixed point results have appeared in recent years. Generally speaking, there usually are two generalizations on them. One is from mappings. The other is from spaces.
Concretely, for one thing, from mappings, for example, the concept of a Kannan contraction mapping was introduced in 1969 by Kannan [2] as follows:
A selfmap T on a metric space \(( X,d )\) is called a Kannan contraction mapping if there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{2})\) such that
In this case, T has a unique fixed point.
Recently, the cyclic contraction mapping has become popular for research activities (see [3–11]). Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space \(( X,d ) \) and let \(T:A\cup B\rightarrow A\cup B\) be a mapping. T is called a cyclic map if and only if \(T ( A ) \subseteq B\) and \(T ( B ) \subseteq A\). In 2003, Kirk et al. [4] introduced a cyclic contraction mapping as follows:
A cyclic map \(T:A\cup B\rightarrow A\cup B\) is said to be a cyclic contraction mapping if there exists \(k\in[0,1)\) such that
Then T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B\).
In 2010, Karapınar and Erhan [12] introduced a Kannan type cyclic contraction mapping as follows:
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space \((X,d)\). A mapping \(T:A\cup B\rightarrow A\cup B\) is called a Kannan type cyclic contraction mapping if there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{2})\) such that
If \(( X,d )\) is still complete, then T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B\) [4, 12].
For another thing, from spaces, there are too many generalizations of metric spaces. For instance, we have the bmetric space, quasimetric space, quasibmetric space, dislocated metric space (or metriclike space), dislocated bmetric space (or bmetriclike space), dislocated quasimetric space (or quasimetriclike space), and the dislocated quasibmetric space (or quasibmetriclike space) (see [3, 5, 9–11, 13–18]). Their definitions are as follows:
Let X be a nonempty set and \(s\geq1\) a real number. Let \(d:X\times X\rightarrow[0,\infty)\) be a mapping and \(x,y,z\in X\):

(d1)
\(d(x,y)=0\Leftrightarrow x=y\);

(d2)
\(d(x,y)=0\Rightarrow x=y\);

(d3)
\(d(x,y)=0=d(y,x)\Rightarrow x=y\);

(d4)
\(d(x,y)=d(y,x)\);

(d5)
\(d(x,z)\leq d(x,y)+d(y,z)\);

(d6)
\(d(x,z)\leq s[d(x,y)+d(y,z)]\), \(s \geq1\).
Then

(1)
\((X,d)\) is called a metric space if (d1), (d4), and (d5) hold;

(2)
\((X,d)\) is called a bmetric space if (d1), (d4), and (d6) hold;

(3)
\((X,d)\) is called a quasimetric space if (d1) and (d5) hold;

(4)
\((X,d)\) is called a quasibmetric space if (d1) and (d6) hold;

(5)
\((X,d)\) is called a dislocated metric space if (d2), (d4), and (d5) hold;

(6)
\((X,d)\) is called a dislocated bmetric space if (d2), (d4), and (d6) hold;

(7)
\((X,d)\) is called a dislocated quasimetric space if (d3) and (d5) hold;

(8)
\((X,d)\) is called a dislocated quasibmetric space if (d3) and (d6) hold.
Despite the fact that the given examples were previously known, we thought it is useful for easy reference to give a full review.
Example 1.1

(a)
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}\) and \(d:X \times X \to[0, \infty)\) be defined as
$$d(x,y)= \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} xy, & x \geq y, \\ 1, & \mbox{otherwise}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$Then \((X,d)\) is a quasimetric space, but it is not a metric space.

(b)
Let \(X=[0, \infty)\) and \(d: X \times X \to[0, \infty)\) be defined as
$$d(x,y)= \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} 0, & x=y, \\ (x+y)^{2}, & \mbox{otherwise}. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$Then \((X,d)\) is a bmetric space, but it is not a metric space.

(c)
Let \(X=C([0,1], \mathbb{R})\) with the usual partial ordering, and let \(d:X \times X \to\mathbb{R}^{+}\) be defined as
$$d(f,g)= \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} \int_{0}^{1}(g(t)f(t))^{3}\, dt, & f \leq g, \\ \int_{0}^{1}(f(t)g(t))^{3}\, dt, & f \geq g. \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$Then \((X,d)\) is a quasibmetric space, but it is not a quasimetric space and bmetric space.

(d)
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}^{+}\) and \(d:X \times X \to\mathbb{R}^{+}\) be defined as \(d(x,y)=\max\{x,y\}\). Then \((X,d)\) is a dislocated metric space, but it is not a metric space.

(e)
Let \(X=[0,1]\) and \(d: X \times X\to\mathbb{R}^{+}\) be defined as \(d(x,y)=xy+x\). Then \((X,d)\) is a dislocated quasimetric space, but it is not a dislocated metric space, and it is not a quasimetric space.

(f)
Let \(X=[0, \infty)\) and \(d: X \times X \to[0, \infty)\) be defined as \(d(x,y)=(x+y)^{2}\). Then \((X,d)\) is a dislocated bmetric space, but it is not a bmetric space.

(g)
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}\) and \(d:X \times X \to[0, \infty)\) be defined as \(d(x,y)=xy^{2}+\frac{x}{n}+\frac{y}{m}\), where \(n, m \in \mathbb{N}\setminus\{1\}\), \(n \neq m\). Then \((X,d)\) is a dislocated quasibmetric space, but it is not a quasibmetric space, dislocated bmetric space and dislocated quasimetric space.
So, we have the process diagram (see Figure 1), where arrows stand for generalization relationships.
Also, scholars are interested in dislocated quasibmetric spaces since they are more general spaces. Based on this fact, we consider fixed point results in such spaces.
For the sake of reader, we recall the following concepts and results.
Definition 1.2
([5])
Let \((X,d)\) be a dislocated quasibmetric space and \(\{ x_{n} \} _{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) be a sequence in X. Then we say that:

(i)
\(\{ x_{n} \} _{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) converges to \(x\in X\) if
$$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}d ( x_{n},x ) =0=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty }d ( x,x_{n} ). $$In this case x is called a \(dqb\)limit of \(\{ x_{n} \}\), and we write it as \(x_{n}\rightarrow x\) (\(n\rightarrow\infty\)).

(ii)
\(\{ x_{n} \} _{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) is a \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence if
$$\lim_{n,m\rightarrow\infty}d ( x_{n},x_{m} ) =0=\lim _{n,m\rightarrow \infty}d ( x_{m},x_{n} ). $$ 
(iii)
\(( X,d ) \) is \(dqb\)complete if every \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence is convergent in X.
Definition 1.3
([5], Definition 2.8)
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a dislocated quasibmetric space \(( X,d )\). A cyclic map \(T:A\cup B\rightarrow A\cup B\) is said to be a dislocated quasibmetriccyclicBanach contraction if there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{s})\), \(s \geq1\), such that
for all \(x\in A\), \(y\in B\).
Definition 1.4
([5], Definition 2.11)
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a dislocated quasibmetric space \(( X,d )\). A cyclic map \(T:A\cup B\rightarrow A\cup B\) is said to be a dislocated quasibmetriccyclicKannan contraction if there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{2s})\), \(s \geq1\), such that
for all \(x\in A\), \(y\in B\).
In [5], the authors proved the following main results.
Theorem 1.5
([5], Theorem 2.9)
Let A and B be nonempty closed subsets of a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space \(( X,d )\). Let T be a cyclic mapping that satisfies the condition of a dislocated quasibmetriccyclicBanach contraction. Then T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B\).
Theorem 1.6
([5], Theorem 2.12)
Let A and B be nonempty closed subsets of a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space \(( X,d )\). Let T be a cyclic mapping that satisfies the condition of a dislocated quasibmetriccyclicKannan contraction. Then T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B\).
2 Main results
In this section, we consider and generalize some previous results. We also prove that the results from Theorem 1.5 and Theorem 1.6 are just equivalent to the respective ordinary fixed point results in the same framework.
First, we recall the following lemma ([8], Remark 2.13).
Lemma 2.1
If some ordinary fixed point theorem in the framework of metric (resp. bmetric) spaces has a true cyclictype extension, then these two theorems are equivalent.
Now we announce the following result.
Theorem 2.2
Theorem 1.5 (that is, [5], Theorem 2.9) is equivalent with the following claim.
Claim 1
Let \(( X,d ) \) be a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s\geq1\), and let \(T:X\rightarrow X\) be a mapping. Assume that there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{s})\) such that for all \(x,y\in X\),
Then T has a unique fixed point in X.
Theorem 2.3
Theorem 1.6 (that is, [5], Theorem 2.12) is equivalent with the following claim.
Claim 2
Let \(( X,d ) \) be a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s\geq1\), and let \(T:X\rightarrow X\) be a mapping. Assume that there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{2s})\) such that for all \(x,y\in X\),
Then T has a unique fixed point in X.
In order to prove the above two theorems, we use the following crucial lemma.
Lemma 2.4
Let \(\{ A_{i} \} _{i=1}^{p}\) be nonempty closed subsets of a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space \((X,d ) \), and suppose that \(T:\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\rightarrow \bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\) satisfies the following conditions:

(1)
\(T ( A_{i} ) \subseteq A_{i+1}\) for \(1\leq i\leq p\) where \(A_{p+1}=A_{1}\);

(2)
there exists \(k\in[0,\frac{1}{s})\) such that for all \(x\in\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\),
$$ d \bigl( T^{2}x,Tx \bigr) \leq kd ( Tx,x ), \qquad d \bigl( Tx,T^{2}x \bigr) \leq kd ( x,Tx ). $$(2.3)
Then \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq\emptyset\).
Proof
If \(k=0\), then for all \(x\in\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\), by (2.3) and (d3), we have \(T ( Tx ) =Tx\), i.e., Tx is a fixed point of T. Thus by (1), it is not hard to verify that \(Tx\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). That is, \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq\emptyset\).
Now, let \(k\in (0,\frac{1}{s} )\) and \(x\in\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). Then by (2.3), on the one hand, we arrive at
On the other hand, we have
Hence by (2.4) and (2.5), we easily speculate that
In other words, we demonstrate that \(\{ T^{n}x \} \) is a \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence in dislocated quasibmetric space \((\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i},d )\). Note that \(( \bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i},d ) \) is \(dqb\)complete, and one establishes that \(\{ T^{n}x \} \) converges to some \(z\in\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). However, in view of (1), \(T^{n}x\) has infinite terms lying in each \(A_{i}\), \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \}\). As \(A_{i}\) is closed for all \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \} \), we claim that \(z\in \bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). Therefore, \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq\emptyset\). □
Proof of Theorem 2.2
Putting \(A_{i}=X\) for \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \} \) in Theorem 1.5, we obtain Claim 1. Conversely, let Claim 1 hold. We shall prove that Theorem 1.5 also holds. Indeed, if \(x\in\bigcup_{i=1}^{m}A_{i}\), then by virtue of Lemma 2.4, one establishes that \(\{ T^{n}x \} \) is a \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence, further, \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq \emptyset\). Now that \(( \bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i},d ) \) is a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space, and we restrict T to \(( \bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i},d ) \) and hence the condition (2.1) holds for all \(x,y\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\), then Claim 1 implies that T has a unique fixed point in \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). Accordingly, Theorem 1.5 is satisfied. □
Proof of Theorem 2.3
We could use the same method as in the proof of Theorem 2.2 and hence the proof is omitted. □
Further, we announce the result for the existence of fixed point under cyclical consideration in the framework following dislocated quasibmetric spaces.
Lemma 2.5
Let \(( X=\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i},d ) \) be a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space. If \(T:X\rightarrow X\) satisfies (1) of Lemma 2.4, and for all \(x\in X=\bigcup_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\), the corresponding Picard sequence \(\{ T^{n}x \} \) is a \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence, then \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq\emptyset\).
Proof
Since \(( X,d ) \) is \(dqb\)complete, then \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence \(\{ T^{n}x \} \) converges to some \(z\in X\). We shall prove that \(z\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). Actually, observing that \(T (A_{i} ) \subseteq A_{i+1}\) for all \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \} \) and \(T ( A_{p+1} ) \subseteq A_{1}\), we conclude that \(\{ T^{n}x \}\) has infinite terms in \(A_{i}\) for all \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \}\). As \(A_{i}\) is closed for all \(i\in \{ 1,2,\ldots,p \}\), we claim that \(z\in\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\). Consequently, \(\bigcap_{i=1}^{p}A_{i}\neq\emptyset\). □
The following two examples support our Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3.
Example 2.6
([5], Example 2.10)
Let \(X= [ 1,1 ] \) and \(Tx =\frac{x}{5}\). Suppose that \(A= [1,0 ] \) and \(B= [ 0,1 ]\). Define the function \(d:X\times X\rightarrow[0,\infty)\) by
Then \(( X,d )\) is a dislocated quasibmetric space with the coefficient \(s=2\). As a consequence of \(d ( 1,1 ) \neq0\), so \(( X,d )\) is not a quasibmetric space. Also, it is not a dislocated bmetric space based on the fact that \(d ( 1,0 ) \neq d ( 0,1 )\). Clearly, \(X=A\cup B\) and \(T ( A ) \subseteq B\), \(T ( B ) \subseteq A\). We shall prove (2.1), where \(k\in [\frac{1}{5},\frac{1}{2})\subseteq[0,\frac{1}{s})\).
Indeed, for all \(x,y\in X\), we have
where \(k\in[\frac{1}{5},\frac{1}{2})\subseteq[0,\frac{1}{s})\). Hence, all the conditions of Claim 1 are satisfied, that is, T has a unique fixed point in X. Now, using Theorem 2.2, we see that T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B= \{0 \}\), i.e., 0 is the unique fixed point of T.
Example 2.7
([5], Example 2.13)
Let \(X= [1,1 ]\) and \(Tx=\frac{x}{7}\). Suppose that \(A= [1,0 ]\) and \(B= [ 0,1 ]\). Define the function \(d:X\times X\rightarrow[0,\infty)\) by
Then \((X,d )\) is a dislocated quasibmetric space with the coefficient \(s=2\). Owing to \(d (1,1 )\neq0\), hence \((X,d )\) is not a quasibmetric space. Also, it is not a dislocated bmetric space because of \(d ( 1,0 ) \neq d (0,1 )\). Further, similar to the preceding example, we can show (2.2), where \(k\in[\frac{2}{23},\frac{1}{2})\subseteq[0,\frac{1}{s})\). Thereupon all the conditions of Claim 2 are satisfied, it ensures us that T has a unique fixed point in X. Now, by Theorem 1.6, T has a unique fixed point in \(A\cap B= \{ 0 \}\). Finally by Theorem 2.3, 0 is a unique fixed point of T.
The following lemmas are useful in proving of all main results in the framework of dislocated quasibmetric spaces. The proofs are almost the same as in [19] for the case of bmetric spaces and hence we omit them.
Lemma 2.8
Let \((X,d ) \) be a dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s\geq1\), and suppose that \(\{x_{n} \}\) and \(\{y_{n} \}\) are \(dqb\)convergent to x, y, respectively. Then we have
and
In particular, if \(x=y\), then \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}d ( x_{n},y_{n} ) =0\) and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}d ( y_{n},x_{n} ) =0\). Moreover, for each \(z\in X\), it follows that
and
Lemma 2.9
Let \(( X,d ) \) be a dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s\geq1\) and let \(\{ x_{n} \} \) be a sequence in X such that
If \(\{ x_{n} \} \) is not a \(dqb\)Cauchy sequence, then there exist \(\varepsilon>0\) and two sequences \(\{ m ( k ) \} \) and \(\{ n ( k ) \} \) of positive integers such that, for the sequences
and
we have
and
Finally, we shall announce a generalization of the recent Geraghty type result from [15], Theorem 2.1, used in the setting of bmetric spaces. In order to use our ideas in the framework of dislocated quasibmetric spaces, we shall consider the class of functions \(\mathcal{B} _{s}\), where \(\beta\in\mathcal{B}_{s}\) satisfies \(\beta:[0,+\infty )\rightarrow [0,\frac{1}{s})\) and has the property
An example of such a β is given by \(\beta (t ) =\frac{1}{s}e^{t}\) for \(t>0\) and \(\beta ( 0 ) \in[0,\frac{1}{s})\).
The following result is a generalization of [15], Theorem 2.1, since we do not assume that the dislocated quasibmetric d is continuous. With regard to its proof, we omit it because it is almost the same as the counterpart in [15], Theorem 2.1, for bmetric spaces without using Lemma 2.8 and Lemma 2.9, however, many other papers have to use them.
Theorem 2.10
Let \(( X,d ) \) be a dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s>1\) and let \(f,g:X\rightarrow X\) be two maps such that \(f ( X ) \subseteq g ( X )\) and one of these two subsets of X is \(dqb\)complete. If for some function \(\beta\in \mathcal{B}_{s}\) and for all \(x,y\in X\) we have
then f and g have a unique point of coincidence ω. Moreover, for each \(x_{0}\in X\), a corresponding Jungck sequence \(\{ y_{n} \} \) can be chosen such that \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}y_{n}=\omega\). In addition, if f and g are weakly compatible, then they have a unique common fixed point.
Taking \(g=I_{X}\) (identity mapping of X) in Theorem 2.10, we see that the following Geraghty type theorem in dislocated quasibmetric spaces.
Corollary 2.11
Let \(( X,d ) \) be a \(dqb\)complete dislocated quasibmetric space with \(s>1\). Suppose that a mapping \(f:X\rightarrow X\) satisfies
for all \(x,y\in X\) and some \(\beta\in\mathcal{B}_{s}\). Then f has a unique fixed point \(z\in X\), and for each \(x\in X\), the Picard sequence \(\{ f^{n}x \} \) converges to z in X.
References
Banach, S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales. Fundam. Math. 3, 133181 (1922)
Kannan, R: Some results on fixed points  II. Am. Math. Mon. 76, 405408 (1969)
George, R, Rajagopalan, R, Vinayagam, S: Cyclic contractions and fixed points in dislocated metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Anal. 7(9), 403411 (2013)
Kirk, WA, Srinavasan, PS, Veeramani, P: Fixed points for mapping satisfying cyclical contractive conditions. Fixed Point Theory 4, 7989 (2003)
Klineam, C, Suanoom, C: Dislocated quasibmetric spaces and fixed point theorems for cyclic contractions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2015, 74 (2015)
Petrić, MA: Some results concerning cyclical contractive mappings. Gen. Math. 18(4), 213226 (2010)
Radenović, S, Došenović, T, AleksićLampert, T, Golubović, Z: A note on some recent fixed point results for cyclic contractions in bmetric spaces and an application to integral equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 273, 155164 (2016)
Roshan, JR, Parvaneh, V, Kadelburg, Z: Common fixed point theorems for weakly isotone increasing mappings in ordered bmetric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 7, 229245 (2014)
Zoto, K, Hoxha, E, Isufati, A: Fixed point theorems for cyclic contraction in dislocated metric spaces. Adv. Res. Sci. Areas 2, 359363 (2013)
Zoto, K, Kumari, PS, Hoxha, E: Some fixed point theorems and cyclic contractions in dislocated and dislocated quasimetric spaces. Am. J. Numer. Anal. 2(3), 7984 (2014)
Shukla, S, Radenović, S, Rajić, VĆ: Some common fixed point theorems in 0σcomplete metriclike spaces. Vietnam J. Math. 41, 341352 (2013)
Karapınar, E, Erhan, IM: Best proximity on different type contraction. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 5, 558569 (2010)
Alghamdi, MA, Hussain, N, Salimi, P: Fixed point and coupled fixed point theorems on bmetriclike spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 142 (2013)
AminiHarandi, A: Metriclike spaces, partial metric spaces and fixed points. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, 204 (2012)
Ding, HS, Imdad, M, Radenović, S, Vujaković, J: On some fixed point results in bmetric, rectangular and brectangular metric spaces. Arab J. Math. Sci. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ajmsc.2015.05.003
Hitzler, P: Generalized metrics and topology in logic programming semantics. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, University College Cork (2001)
Wilson, WA: On quasimetric spaces. Am. J. Math. 53(3), 675684 (1931)
Zhu, CX, Chen, CF, Zhang, X: Some results in quasibmetriclike spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 437 (2014)
Salimi, P, Hussain, N, Shukla, S, Fathollahi, S, Radenović, S: Fixed point results for cyclic αψϕcontractions with applications to integral equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 290, 445458 (2015)
Acknowledgements
The first and second authors are thankful to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia. The third author is thankful to the science and technology research project of education department in Hubei province of China (B2015137).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
DolićaninÐekić, D., Došenović, T., Huang, H. et al. A note on recent cyclic fixed point results in dislocated quasibmetric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl 2016, 74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366301605659
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366301605659
MSC
 54H25
 47H10
Keywords
 fixed point
 dislocated quasibmetric space
 Banach contraction
 Kannan contraction