- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Some Common Fixed Point Theorems for Weakly Compatible Mappings in Metric Spaces

*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*
**volume 2009**, Article number: 804734 (2009)

## Abstract

We establish a common fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings generalizing a result of Khan and Kubiaczyk (1988). Also, an example is given to support our generalization. We also prove common fixed point theorems for weakly compatible mappings in metric and compact metric spaces.

## 1. Introduction

In the last years, fixed point theorems have been applied to show the existence and uniqueness of the solutions of differential equations, integral equations and many other branches mathematics (see, e.g., [1–3]). Some common fixed point theorems for weakly commuting, compatible, -compatible and weakly compatible mappings under different contractive conditions in metric spaces have appeared in [4–15]. Throughout this paper, is a metric space.

For all , we define

where , for some and , for some .

If for some , we denote , and for , and , respectively. Also, if , then one can deduce that .

It follows immediately from the definition of that, for every ,

We need the following definitions and lemmas.

Definition 1.1 (see [16]).

A sequence of nonempty subsets of is said to be *convergent* to if:

(i)each point in is the limit of a convergent sequence , where is in for (:= the set of all positive integers),

(ii)for arbitrary , there exists an integer such that for , where denotes the set of all points in for which there exists a point in , depending on such that .

is then said to be the *limit* of the sequence .

Definition 1.2 (see [9]).

A set-valued function is said to be *continuous* if for any sequence in with , it yields .

Lemma 1.3 (see [16]).

If and are sequences in converging to and in , respectively, then the sequence converges to .

Lemma 1.4 (see [16]).

Let be a sequence in and let be a point in such that . Then the sequence converges to the set in .

Lemma 1.5 (see [9]).

For any , it yields that .

Lemma 1.6 (see [17]).

Let be a right continuous function such that for every . Then, for every , where denotes the -times repeated composition of with itself.

Definition 1.7 (see [15]).

The mappings and are *weakly commuting on* if and for all .

Definition 1.8 (see [13]).

The mappings and are said to be -*compatible* if whenever is a sequence in such that , and for some .

Definition 1.9 (see [13]).

The mappings and are *weakly compatible* if they commute at coincidence points, that is, for each point such that , then (note that the equation implies that is a singleton).

If is a single-valued mapping, then Definition 1.7 (resp., Definitions 1.8 and 1.9) reduces to the concept of weak commutativity (resp., compatibility and weak compatibility) for single-valued mappings due to Sessa [18] (resp., Jungck [11, 12]).

It can be seen that

but the converse of these implications may not be true (see, [13, 15]).

Throughtout this paper, we assume that is the set of all functions satisfying the following conditions:

(i) is upper semi-continuous continuous at a point from the right, and non-decreasing in each coodinate variable,

(ii)For each , .

Theorem 1.10 (see [19]).

Let be mappings of a complete metric space into and be a mapping of into itself such that and are continuous, , , , and for all ,

where satisfies (i) and for each , and , with . Then and have a unique common fixed point such that .

In the present paper, we are concerned with the following:

(1)replacing the commutativity of the mappings in Theorem 1.10 by the weak compatibility of a pair of mappings to obtain a common fixed point theorem metric spaces without the continuity assumption of the mappings,

(2)giving an example to support our generalization of Theorem 1.10,

(3)establishing another common fixed point theorem for two families of set-valued mappings and two single-valued mappings,

(4)proving a common fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings under a strict contractive condition on compact metric spaces.

## 2. Main Results

In this section, we establish a common fixed point theorem in metric spaces generalizing Theorems 1.10. Also, an example is introduced to support our generalization. We prove a common fixed point theorem for two families of set-valued mappings and two single-valued mappings. Finally, we establish a common fixed point theorem under a strict contractive condition on compact metric spaces.

First we state and prove the following.

Theorem 2.1.

Let be two sefmaps of a metric space and let be two set-valued mappings with

Suppose that one of and is complete and the pairs and are weakly compatible. If there exists a function such that for all ,

then there is a point such that .

Proof.

Let be an arbitrary point in . By (2.1), we choose a point in such that and for this point there exists a point in such that . Continuing this manner we can define a sequence as follows:

for . For simplicity, we put for . By (2.2) and (2.3), we have that

If , then

This contradiction demands that

Similarly, one can deduce that

So, for each , we obtain that

where . By (2.8) and Lemma 1.6, we obtain that . Since

then . Therefore, is a Cauchy sequence.

Let be an arbitrary point in for . Then and is a Cauchy sequence. We assume without loss of generality that is complete. Let be the sequence defined by (2.3). But for all . Hence, we find that

as . So, is a Cauchy sequence. Hence, for some . But by (2.3), so that . Consequently, . Moreover, we have, for , that . Therefore, . So, we have by Lemma 1.4 that . In like manner it follows that and .

Since, for ,

and as , we get from Lemma 1.3 that

This is absurd. So, . But , so such that . If , , then we have

We must conclude that .

Since and the pair is weakly compatible, so . Using the inequality (2.2), we have

This contradiction demands that . Similarly, if the pair is weakly compatible, one can deduce that . Therefore, we get that .

The proof, assuming the completeness of , is similar to the above.

To see that is unique, suppose that . If , then

which is inadmissible. So, .

Now, we give an example to show the greater generality of Theorem 2.1 over Theorem 1.10.

Example 2.2.

Let endowed with the Euclidean metric . Assume that for every . Define and as follows:

We have that and . Moreover, if . If , then and . So, we obtain that

for all . It is clear that is a complete metric space. Since is a closed subset of , so is complete. We note that is a -compatible pair and therefore a weakly compatible pair. Also, and , that is, and are weakly compatible. On the other hand, if , so that even though , that is, is not a -compatible pair. We know that is the unique common fixed point of and . Hence the hypotheses of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Theorem 1.10 is not applicable because for all , and the maps *I*, *J* and *G* are not continuous at .

In Theorem 2.1, if the mappings and are replaced by and , where is an index set, we obtain the following.

Theorem 2.3.

Let be a metric space, and let be selfmaps of , and for , be set-valued mappings with and . Suppose that one of and is complete and for the pairs and are weakly compatible. If there exists a function such that, for all ,

then there is a point such that for each .

Proof.

Using Theorem 2.1, we obtain for any , there is a unique point such that and . For all

This yields that .

Inspired by the work of Chang [9], we state the following theorem on compact metric spaces.

Theorem 2.4.

Let be a compact metric space, selfmaps of set-valued functions with and Suppose that the pairs , are weakly compatible and the functions , are continuous. If there exists a function , and for all , the following inequality:

holds whenever the right-hand side of (2.20) is positive, then there is a unique point in such that .

## References

Pathak HK, Fisher B:

**Common fixed point theorems with applications in dynamic programming.***Glasnik Matematički*1996,**31**(51):321–328.Pathak HK, Khan MS, Tiwari R:

**A common fixed point theorem and its application to nonlinear integral equations.***Computers & Mathematics with Applications*2007,**53**(6):961–971. 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.046Pathak HK, Mishra SN, Kalinde AK:

**Common fixed point theorems with applications to nonlinear integral equations.***Demonstratio Mathematica*1999,**32**(3):547–564.Ahmed MA:

**Common fixed point theorems for weakly compatible mappings.***The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics*2003,**33**(4):1189–1203. 10.1216/rmjm/1181075457Ahmed MA:

**Common fixed points for four mappings under a contractive condition of Kiventidis type.***Proceedings of the Mathematical and Physical Society of Egypt*2005, (83):83–93.Ahmed MA, Rhoades BE:

**Some common fixed point theorems for compatible mappings.***Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics*2001,**32**(8):1247–1254.Banerjee A, Singh TB:

**A fixed point theorem for set-valued mappings.***Applied Mathematics and Mechanics*2001,**22**(12):1397–1403.Banerjee A, Thakur BS:

**A note on a theorem of Tas, Telci and Fisher.***Applied Mathematics and Mechanics*1998,**19**(4):333–334. 10.1007/BF02457537Chang T-H:

**Fixed point theorems for contractive type set-valued mappings.***Mathematica Japonica*1993,**38**(4):675–690.Ćirić LjB, Nikolić NT, Ume JS:

**Common fixed point theorems for weakly compatible quasi contraction mappings.***Acta Mathematica Hungarica*2006,**113**(4):257–267. 10.1007/s10474-006-0103-zJungck G:

**Compatible mappings and common fixed points.***International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences*1986,**9**(4):771–779. 10.1155/S0161171286000935Jungck G:

**Common fixed points for commuting and compatible maps on compacta.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1988,**103**(3):977–983. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0947693-2Jungck G, Rhoades BE:

**Fixed points for set valued functions without continuity.***Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics*1998,**29**(3):227–238.Khan AR, Domlo AA, Hussain N:

**Coincidences of Lipschitz-type hybrid maps and invariant approximation.***Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization*2007,**28**(9–10):1165–1177. 10.1080/01630560701563859Sessa S, Khan MS, Imdad M:

**A common fixed point theorem with a weak commutativity condition.***Glasnik Matematički. Serija III*1986,**21**(41):225–235.Fisher B:

**Common fixed points of mappings and set-valued mappings.***Rostocker Mathematisches Kolloquium*1981, (18):69–77.Matkowski J:

**Fixed point theorems for mappings with a contractive iterate at a point.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1977,**62**(2):344–348. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1977-0436113-5Sessa S:

**On a weak commutativity condition of mappings in fixed point considerations.***Publications de l'Institut Mathématique. Nouvelle Série*1982,**32**(46):149–153.Khan MS, Kubiaczyk I:

**Fixed point theorems for point to set maps.***Mathematica Japonica*1988,**33**(3):409–415.

## Acknowledgment

The author wishes to thank the refrees for their comments which improved the original manuscript.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Ahmed, M.A. Some Common Fixed Point Theorems for Weakly Compatible Mappings in Metric Spaces.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl* **2009**, 804734 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/804734

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/804734